<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ironmaster Quick-Lock Dumbbell System Review Part-1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/</link>
	<description>The Lord Is My Strength &#124; psalm 28:7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 01:01:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7322</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7322</guid>
		<description>Derek, have you tried contacting Ironmaster? E-Mail Matt Dawson (the owner) and ask him what you should do or where you can go to obtain the items you want. matt@ironmaster.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek, have you tried contacting Ironmaster? E-Mail Matt Dawson (the owner) and ask him what you should do or where you can go to obtain the items you want. <a href="mailto:matt@ironmaster.com">matt@ironmaster.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7321</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 11:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7321</guid>
		<description>Ken, I apologize for overlooking your post some 9 months ago. Somehow it slipped by my. No, the IM2000 is not overkill. The quality of the machine is without question in my view and I think you would love it. I suggest calling Ironmaster to see the best way for you to make a purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken, I apologize for overlooking your post some 9 months ago. Somehow it slipped by my. No, the IM2000 is not overkill. The quality of the machine is without question in my view and I think you would love it. I suggest calling Ironmaster to see the best way for you to make a purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7129</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 01:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7129</guid>
		<description>Glad I found this site!  Great info!

I&#039;m new to weightlifting (but not to cardio; I run regularly), and I&#039;m considering buying IM&#039;s Package 4.  Considering I&#039;m a beginner, do you guys think this might be overkill?

Also, for anyone living in Canada, have you guys found any other Canadian retailers other than the ones listed above (Fitness Equipment Ottawa and Exercise Direct)?  I&#039;m located in Toronto.

Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad I found this site!  Great info!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m new to weightlifting (but not to cardio; I run regularly), and I&#8217;m considering buying IM&#8217;s Package 4.  Considering I&#8217;m a beginner, do you guys think this might be overkill?</p>
<p>Also, for anyone living in Canada, have you guys found any other Canadian retailers other than the ones listed above (Fitness Equipment Ottawa and Exercise Direct)?  I&#8217;m located in Toronto.</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7113</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7113</guid>
		<description>Hi Guys,

Can anyone advise if it is possible to purchase IronMaster products in Europe? I am from the Rep. of Ireland and am very interested in purchasing IronMaster 75lb QL + Superbench + various attachments.

Thanks in advance,
Derek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys,</p>
<p>Can anyone advise if it is possible to purchase IronMaster products in Europe? I am from the Rep. of Ireland and am very interested in purchasing IronMaster 75lb QL + Superbench + various attachments.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance,<br />
Derek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7089</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7089</guid>
		<description>George, I am happy to have helped you in your quest in any way possible. 

Yes, as I have said numerous times over, the adjustable bench Ironmaster produces is without equal at this price range. Experience have proven that many adjustable benches twice this price are vastly inferior to the Superbench. 

Ironmaster continues to have the best equipment in the world for the money as far as I am concerned. This has been my position for next to three years, and it will be my position until something better comes along.

I continue to keep my eye peeled and ears open for my readers, because quality and above all, customer service, continue to be hallmarks I look for in a strength company. If I recommend it, that means it is superb. You can count on it.

Let us know how your training goes.

Keep your eyes on this site. Change is afoot. New posts coming soon.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, I am happy to have helped you in your quest in any way possible. </p>
<p>Yes, as I have said numerous times over, the adjustable bench Ironmaster produces is without equal at this price range. Experience have proven that many adjustable benches twice this price are vastly inferior to the Superbench. </p>
<p>Ironmaster continues to have the best equipment in the world for the money as far as I am concerned. This has been my position for next to three years, and it will be my position until something better comes along.</p>
<p>I continue to keep my eye peeled and ears open for my readers, because quality and above all, customer service, continue to be hallmarks I look for in a strength company. If I recommend it, that means it is superb. You can count on it.</p>
<p>Let us know how your training goes.</p>
<p>Keep your eyes on this site. Change is afoot. New posts coming soon.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7088</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7088</guid>
		<description>Tim,

I got my IM Super Bench on Saturday.  I must say, I was very sceptical at first but this bench is BY FAR the best &quot;home&quot; bench press I have ever seen or owned.  I emphasize the word &quot;home&quot; because this bench could easily be used in most gym settings.  At one of the gyms I work at they have Lifefitness benches.  The Super Bench blows these away as far as quality and versatility.  I have owned and sold several brands of benches over the years (I used to sell equipment) but none compare to this.  I honestly was expecting something decent but when I say decent I mean good as far as a &quot;home&quot; bench.  This is just like a commercial bench.  I was concerned about benching heavy weights on this bench (sometimes in the 400 pound range).  This is no longer a concern at all.  I have even done heavy declines on it without even a shake.  

I appreciate the help in picking this bench.  This will be the bench I recommend to all my clients from now on.

-George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>I got my IM Super Bench on Saturday.  I must say, I was very sceptical at first but this bench is BY FAR the best &#8220;home&#8221; bench press I have ever seen or owned.  I emphasize the word &#8220;home&#8221; because this bench could easily be used in most gym settings.  At one of the gyms I work at they have Lifefitness benches.  The Super Bench blows these away as far as quality and versatility.  I have owned and sold several brands of benches over the years (I used to sell equipment) but none compare to this.  I honestly was expecting something decent but when I say decent I mean good as far as a &#8220;home&#8221; bench.  This is just like a commercial bench.  I was concerned about benching heavy weights on this bench (sometimes in the 400 pound range).  This is no longer a concern at all.  I have even done heavy declines on it without even a shake.  </p>
<p>I appreciate the help in picking this bench.  This will be the bench I recommend to all my clients from now on.</p>
<p>-George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7084</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7084</guid>
		<description>Paul I think it would be best for you to contact Ironmaster and discuss these concerns with Matt. Perhaps he can provide some insight that might be helpful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul I think it would be best for you to contact Ironmaster and discuss these concerns with Matt. Perhaps he can provide some insight that might be helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7080</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7080</guid>
		<description>In working out more and testing the DBs, I decided to weight them to see just how &quot;off&quot; the weights might be.  I was a little disappointed to find out that with four 5-lb plates weighed in at 18.8 lbs.  Weighing the whole 75-lb set came in at 70.8.  Doing the math, there is a slight discrepancy.  So to be fair I would just round the full DB set to 71 lbs.  That&#039;s 5.33% off.  

That being said, I&#039;m still very happy with the set.  A typical weight change (adding 2-4 plates on one DB) averaged around 20 seconds.  Both DBs definitely under a minute.  As I said, still faster then the typical adjustable DBs.

To wrap things up, given the price, quality, and size of the set, it&#039;s hard for me to rate it any lower than a 9/10.  

Hope this helps anyone that may be in the market for some adjustable DBs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In working out more and testing the DBs, I decided to weight them to see just how &#8220;off&#8221; the weights might be.  I was a little disappointed to find out that with four 5-lb plates weighed in at 18.8 lbs.  Weighing the whole 75-lb set came in at 70.8.  Doing the math, there is a slight discrepancy.  So to be fair I would just round the full DB set to 71 lbs.  That&#8217;s 5.33% off.  </p>
<p>That being said, I&#8217;m still very happy with the set.  A typical weight change (adding 2-4 plates on one DB) averaged around 20 seconds.  Both DBs definitely under a minute.  As I said, still faster then the typical adjustable DBs.</p>
<p>To wrap things up, given the price, quality, and size of the set, it&#8217;s hard for me to rate it any lower than a 9/10.  </p>
<p>Hope this helps anyone that may be in the market for some adjustable DBs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7070</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7070</guid>
		<description>Paul, thanks for leaving such an informative review. It is comments like this that really make this review so helpful to so many people.

I am also glad that you like your QL&#039;s. Not surprisingly, I have yet to get any negative feedback on the QL&#039;s. People just love&#039;em. Kudos to Matt and the guys at Ironmaster for making such a terrific product.

Keep us posted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, thanks for leaving such an informative review. It is comments like this that really make this review so helpful to so many people.</p>
<p>I am also glad that you like your QL&#8217;s. Not surprisingly, I have yet to get any negative feedback on the QL&#8217;s. People just love&#8217;em. Kudos to Matt and the guys at Ironmaster for making such a terrific product.</p>
<p>Keep us posted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7069</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7069</guid>
		<description>This seems to be the best ongoing conversation on the Ironmaster dumbbells.  I thought I&#039;d share my personal experience.  

I needed some DBs for my very small workout room in my home and as with most people, it came down to Ironmaster vs Powerblock DBs.  I&#039;ve read great things about both sets, but I chose the IMs.  My main reason: Price to Value.  They also came VERY fast.  I ordered last Monday, got them on Saturday.  Of course this will vary.

From what I&#039;ve read (because I&#039;ve never used them) the Powerblocks have mainly two things going for them.  The speed of weight change, and the weight tolerance.  You can&#039;t dispute the speed of Powerblocks.  I have played with a set and they are much faster than IMs.  Having just got my IMs a few days ago, the weight change is slow.  But MUCH better than spin-lock collars.  And the way I work out, it&#039;s hardly ever a problem.  Regarding the weight tolerance, it wasn&#039;t a deal breaker for me, but it seems Ironmaster has addressed the issue in a professional manner.  

I&#039;m sure Powerblocks are a great item as well, but the price to value of IMs is just unbeatable.  Especially with the rack.  Powerblocks just weren&#039;t in my budget.

Speaking about the IMs, the quality is superb, as everyone has said before.  The flat ends of the DBs is very convenient.  The rack is solid, and I put it together carefully, well under an hour.  I really like the handles and how they feel in my hand.  Much better than my old adjustable DBs.  Changing weights is a simple process, and I&#039;m sure anyone can get faster.  But I don&#039;t want to try and speed through changes and have a plate fall on my foot.  Having another pair of DBs around helps for super sets, among other things.  You might ask, why bother with adjustable DBs then?  Well, many people already have old equipment the never got rid of.  Also, so little space is used by the IM set that you have extra room to work with. 

All in all, the Ironmaster QL Dumbbells are a great product.  I am (so far) very happy with my investment.  The quality is so good, it really makes me want to get the Super Bench as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems to be the best ongoing conversation on the Ironmaster dumbbells.  I thought I&#8217;d share my personal experience.  </p>
<p>I needed some DBs for my very small workout room in my home and as with most people, it came down to Ironmaster vs Powerblock DBs.  I&#8217;ve read great things about both sets, but I chose the IMs.  My main reason: Price to Value.  They also came VERY fast.  I ordered last Monday, got them on Saturday.  Of course this will vary.</p>
<p>From what I&#8217;ve read (because I&#8217;ve never used them) the Powerblocks have mainly two things going for them.  The speed of weight change, and the weight tolerance.  You can&#8217;t dispute the speed of Powerblocks.  I have played with a set and they are much faster than IMs.  Having just got my IMs a few days ago, the weight change is slow.  But MUCH better than spin-lock collars.  And the way I work out, it&#8217;s hardly ever a problem.  Regarding the weight tolerance, it wasn&#8217;t a deal breaker for me, but it seems Ironmaster has addressed the issue in a professional manner.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure Powerblocks are a great item as well, but the price to value of IMs is just unbeatable.  Especially with the rack.  Powerblocks just weren&#8217;t in my budget.</p>
<p>Speaking about the IMs, the quality is superb, as everyone has said before.  The flat ends of the DBs is very convenient.  The rack is solid, and I put it together carefully, well under an hour.  I really like the handles and how they feel in my hand.  Much better than my old adjustable DBs.  Changing weights is a simple process, and I&#8217;m sure anyone can get faster.  But I don&#8217;t want to try and speed through changes and have a plate fall on my foot.  Having another pair of DBs around helps for super sets, among other things.  You might ask, why bother with adjustable DBs then?  Well, many people already have old equipment the never got rid of.  Also, so little space is used by the IM set that you have extra room to work with. </p>
<p>All in all, the Ironmaster QL Dumbbells are a great product.  I am (so far) very happy with my investment.  The quality is so good, it really makes me want to get the Super Bench as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7067</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:46:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7067</guid>
		<description>Tom welcome aboard! I have to tell ya that it is so validating to hear people tell me how great these dumbbells are, because after all I spent a lot of time and effort trying to tell the world how great they are. However, it must be an even better feeling to have me tell you how solid they are, then you actually get them and discover for yourself how truly great they are.

Talk about rambling! Did that make any sense whatsoever? hehehe

Anyway, keep us posted with your impressions, good or bad. Something tells me that most of your impressions will be favorable. 

Timothy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom welcome aboard! I have to tell ya that it is so validating to hear people tell me how great these dumbbells are, because after all I spent a lot of time and effort trying to tell the world how great they are. However, it must be an even better feeling to have me tell you how solid they are, then you actually get them and discover for yourself how truly great they are.</p>
<p>Talk about rambling! Did that make any sense whatsoever? hehehe</p>
<p>Anyway, keep us posted with your impressions, good or bad. Something tells me that most of your impressions will be favorable. </p>
<p>Timothy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7066</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:37:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7066</guid>
		<description>Bought a set of QL &amp; 120 add on last week.  Thanks for the great site.  I e-mailed Matt to let him know it was a big part of my decision process.  So far so good.  I will give it a bit more time b4 I write a more detailed reviewed.  These things are solid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bought a set of QL &amp; 120 add on last week.  Thanks for the great site.  I e-mailed Matt to let him know it was a big part of my decision process.  So far so good.  I will give it a bit more time b4 I write a more detailed reviewed.  These things are solid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7053</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:34:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7053</guid>
		<description>Oh wait, my bad. You said you weighed 220 and benched 400....for a total of 620 right? In that case, I think the bench should hold up fine. But again, I have never benched 400 on it, so talk to Matt! He is very approachable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wait, my bad. You said you weighed 220 and benched 400&#8230;.for a total of 620 right? In that case, I think the bench should hold up fine. But again, I have never benched 400 on it, so talk to Matt! He is very approachable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7052</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7052</guid>
		<description>I appreciate the honest answer.  I sure don&#039;t know about 850 but I hope one day!

Thanks again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciate the honest answer.  I sure don&#8217;t know about 850 but I hope one day!</p>
<p>Thanks again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7051</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7051</guid>
		<description>George, thanks. The comments are getting so long now it&#039;s hard to keep track of what I have said!

Having read what I wrote, I think I can stand behind the spirit of it. If someone is a truly competitive powerlifter, and is capable of routinely benching more than 400 lbs, I just think you should consider a traditional bench, UNLESS you have a good power rack. Even still, talk to Matt. Get his feelings on the matter. Tell him how strong you are and that you will routinely subject the bench to 850 pounds. My guess is that Matt will tell you that you have nothing to worry about. The truth is I am not nearly as strong as you, and never have been. So, I do not feel qualified to give you a definitive answer regarding traditional barbell bench presses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, thanks. The comments are getting so long now it&#8217;s hard to keep track of what I have said!</p>
<p>Having read what I wrote, I think I can stand behind the spirit of it. If someone is a truly competitive powerlifter, and is capable of routinely benching more than 400 lbs, I just think you should consider a traditional bench, UNLESS you have a good power rack. Even still, talk to Matt. Get his feelings on the matter. Tell him how strong you are and that you will routinely subject the bench to 850 pounds. My guess is that Matt will tell you that you have nothing to worry about. The truth is I am not nearly as strong as you, and never have been. So, I do not feel qualified to give you a definitive answer regarding traditional barbell bench presses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7050</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 00:15:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7050</guid>
		<description>Tim,

Thanks for your quick response.  On April 7th, 2007 you said:

&quot;I think the Super Bench is the best bench you can buy. I tell everyone that. They only application in which I would not recommend it would be competition power lifting. The bench is flat rated at (I think) 1000 pounds (I might be wrong about this, but I am pretty sure that is right). The problem is that it does not have uprights. So, it is not ideally suited for traditional barbell bench presses, though I have used it for that purpose more times than I can count.

I am just saying that if you are a heavy bench presser, you may also wish to invest in a professional, heavy duty competition bench. That said, for dumbbell work there is not a better adjustable bench in the world that I am aware of. You will love it!&quot;

That was cut and pasted directly from this sight.  I do believe this bench is solid (I&#039;ve heard nothing but), but I am a tad bit concerned since this was the only time I had heard anything about this bench when related to powerlifting.  I think I will call Matt and see what he thinks.

Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>Thanks for your quick response.  On April 7th, 2007 you said:</p>
<p>&#8220;I think the Super Bench is the best bench you can buy. I tell everyone that. They only application in which I would not recommend it would be competition power lifting. The bench is flat rated at (I think) 1000 pounds (I might be wrong about this, but I am pretty sure that is right). The problem is that it does not have uprights. So, it is not ideally suited for traditional barbell bench presses, though I have used it for that purpose more times than I can count.</p>
<p>I am just saying that if you are a heavy bench presser, you may also wish to invest in a professional, heavy duty competition bench. That said, for dumbbell work there is not a better adjustable bench in the world that I am aware of. You will love it!&#8221;</p>
<p>That was cut and pasted directly from this sight.  I do believe this bench is solid (I&#8217;ve heard nothing but), but I am a tad bit concerned since this was the only time I had heard anything about this bench when related to powerlifting.  I think I will call Matt and see what he thinks.</p>
<p>Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7049</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7049</guid>
		<description>Hi George. Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment.

I am uncertain to what you are referring. I was scanning these comments and cannot see where I said that the bench would not be good as a powerlifting bench. Can you show me what I said or what someone else said that has you concerned?

My personal feeling is that this bench is a solid bench for anyone benching 400 lbs. I do happen to think that if a person is routinely benching well above 400 lbs, then they out to call Ironmaster and speak with Matt. 

The bench does NOT rattle. Not one little bit. It&#039;s as solid as an adjustable bench can be. In fact, it&#039;s easily more stable than any adjustable bench I have ever found in a commercial gym. That is not an exaggeration. It&#039;s as tight as a ticks ear.

Having said that, when you look at the competition powerlifting benches that can handle 1000 pounds with ease, then you are comparing apples and oranges.

Still, call Matt at Ironmaster and speak with him. I think this is a bench you would enjoy having and it would be great in the application you are considering.

Hope this helps.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi George. Thanks for stopping by and leaving a comment.</p>
<p>I am uncertain to what you are referring. I was scanning these comments and cannot see where I said that the bench would not be good as a powerlifting bench. Can you show me what I said or what someone else said that has you concerned?</p>
<p>My personal feeling is that this bench is a solid bench for anyone benching 400 lbs. I do happen to think that if a person is routinely benching well above 400 lbs, then they out to call Ironmaster and speak with Matt. </p>
<p>The bench does NOT rattle. Not one little bit. It&#8217;s as solid as an adjustable bench can be. In fact, it&#8217;s easily more stable than any adjustable bench I have ever found in a commercial gym. That is not an exaggeration. It&#8217;s as tight as a ticks ear.</p>
<p>Having said that, when you look at the competition powerlifting benches that can handle 1000 pounds with ease, then you are comparing apples and oranges.</p>
<p>Still, call Matt at Ironmaster and speak with him. I think this is a bench you would enjoy having and it would be great in the application you are considering.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7048</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 23:08:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7048</guid>
		<description>Great site!  Just what I&#039;ve been looking for.  I am a personal trainer.  I do alot of training in a gym and in people&#039;s homes.  One of the gyms I used to work at got bought out and I managed to get enough of the equipment to start up my own home gym.  I must say I lucked out and acquired quite a nice set up (most of the stuff I got for free!).  I have a power rack, a commercial leg press, a lat pulldown, etc., etc, etc (all in a 23&#039;x14&#039; room).  I am now starting to do some private training in my home as well.  My problem is that I have a flat bench and a non adjustable incline bench.  I want to consolidate this into one good flat to incline bench (for space saving reasons).  I have been looking at the IM Super Bench for a few months.  It seems to have everything I like.  I especially like the fact that unlike other adjustable benches, this bench doesn&#039;t have that &quot;gap&quot; between the back pad and butt pad.   Now here&#039;s my dilema.  I do almost all my own training at home now.  I am a competitive powerlifter.  I bench out of the power rack so not having uprights is no big deal to me.  The Super Bench is rated up to 1000 lbs.  I weigh around 220 and bench in the mid 400&#039;s (I usually train with weights in the mid 300&#039;s but around contest time go well into the 400&#039;s).  According to the websight, this bench can handle this (220+400=620).  But, this being said, I read what you wrote about the bench not being suited for a powerlifter.  Why is this?   Is it not sturdy enough for this kind of weigh?  Would it rattle around with this kind of weight?  I know this would be a perfect bench for my clients (by the way, I don&#039;t train any powerlifters, mainly just people trying to get fit) but would it work for me or would I be waisting my money?

Thanks for any input.
-George</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site!  Just what I&#8217;ve been looking for.  I am a personal trainer.  I do alot of training in a gym and in people&#8217;s homes.  One of the gyms I used to work at got bought out and I managed to get enough of the equipment to start up my own home gym.  I must say I lucked out and acquired quite a nice set up (most of the stuff I got for free!).  I have a power rack, a commercial leg press, a lat pulldown, etc., etc, etc (all in a 23&#8242;x14&#8242; room).  I am now starting to do some private training in my home as well.  My problem is that I have a flat bench and a non adjustable incline bench.  I want to consolidate this into one good flat to incline bench (for space saving reasons).  I have been looking at the IM Super Bench for a few months.  It seems to have everything I like.  I especially like the fact that unlike other adjustable benches, this bench doesn&#8217;t have that &#8220;gap&#8221; between the back pad and butt pad.   Now here&#8217;s my dilema.  I do almost all my own training at home now.  I am a competitive powerlifter.  I bench out of the power rack so not having uprights is no big deal to me.  The Super Bench is rated up to 1000 lbs.  I weigh around 220 and bench in the mid 400&#8242;s (I usually train with weights in the mid 300&#8242;s but around contest time go well into the 400&#8242;s).  According to the websight, this bench can handle this (220+400=620).  But, this being said, I read what you wrote about the bench not being suited for a powerlifter.  Why is this?   Is it not sturdy enough for this kind of weigh?  Would it rattle around with this kind of weight?  I know this would be a perfect bench for my clients (by the way, I don&#8217;t train any powerlifters, mainly just people trying to get fit) but would it work for me or would I be waisting my money?</p>
<p>Thanks for any input.<br />
-George</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7010</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:26:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7010</guid>
		<description>Ike thanks for getting back to us (it&#039;s like we are a family now- heheh)

I spoke to Matt and he was of the opinion that the 75&#039;s would be plenty for you and that the bench would be a great addition. 

People who have gotten the bench love it. It&#039;s tough as nails and so versatile. You won&#039;t be disappointed.

Welcome to the family! :D

Timothy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ike thanks for getting back to us (it&#8217;s like we are a family now- heheh)</p>
<p>I spoke to Matt and he was of the opinion that the 75&#8242;s would be plenty for you and that the bench would be a great addition. </p>
<p>People who have gotten the bench love it. It&#8217;s tough as nails and so versatile. You won&#8217;t be disappointed.</p>
<p>Welcome to the family! <img src='http://totalphysiqueonline.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Timothy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7009</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:15:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7009</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the reply. That was rather quick if you ask me! So I went through the workout regimen again and looked on the P90X community website and what do you know, the SuperBench was strongly recommended by a few of the people on the program. Turns out you can in fact use the Bench and as you said, it will be nice to be able to change things up some. I&#039;m definitely settled on getting the QuickLook + SuperBench + 1-2 attachments now, but I&#039;ll have to wait till April 2nd or so to order it, to give me more room in spacing out the payment on the credit card. The wait sucks, but what can you do.

Thanks again. I will definitely mention this site when I place the order and I&#039;ll be back to write my impressions of everything when they arrive and I put them into action.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the reply. That was rather quick if you ask me! So I went through the workout regimen again and looked on the P90X community website and what do you know, the SuperBench was strongly recommended by a few of the people on the program. Turns out you can in fact use the Bench and as you said, it will be nice to be able to change things up some. I&#8217;m definitely settled on getting the QuickLook + SuperBench + 1-2 attachments now, but I&#8217;ll have to wait till April 2nd or so to order it, to give me more room in spacing out the payment on the credit card. The wait sucks, but what can you do.</p>
<p>Thanks again. I will definitely mention this site when I place the order and I&#8217;ll be back to write my impressions of everything when they arrive and I put them into action.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7007</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7007</guid>
		<description>Ike, I am sorry it took so long to reply to your post. I was in bed when you left the comment.

Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to read this one comment thread. It is a DOOZY! I never imagine it would grow like it has.

As for your dilemma, let me say that I understand the concerns over spending money like this. Especially in today&#039;s economy. However, I think that it&#039;s important to remember that the cost of iron and steel almost never goes down. While Ironmaster has done very well at keeping their costs stable over the years, I do not foresee a situation where their prices will come down unless they have a sale of some sort.

Your workouts will change over the coming weeks and months, if for no other reason than to keep things fresh and interesting. But the real reason you will want to mix things up down the road is because in terms of muscle strength gains, your body needs a variety of movements in order to  continue progressing.

Whether you get the Super Bench, or some other Bench, I strongly recommend getting a bench of some sort. The Super Bench represents a great value because it is so damn tough and ruggedly built. The padding is dense and firm and offers terrific support, yet it is also extremely comfortable. Moreover, it is more adjustable than any adjustable bench I have ever used. And at the risk of appearing to &quot;sell you up&quot;, I strongly encourage you to get Matt to throw in the sit-up attachment. It&#039;s only like 35.00, and well worth it.

Get back to me with your thoughts and questions.

(PS: Matt is the owner of Ironmaster. When you call Ironmaster, ask to speak to HIM as he has the authority to work deals for you, if any can be worked out. Mention my site. That might help some.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ike, I am sorry it took so long to reply to your post. I was in bed when you left the comment.</p>
<p>Thanks for stopping by and taking the time to read this one comment thread. It is a DOOZY! I never imagine it would grow like it has.</p>
<p>As for your dilemma, let me say that I understand the concerns over spending money like this. Especially in today&#8217;s economy. However, I think that it&#8217;s important to remember that the cost of iron and steel almost never goes down. While Ironmaster has done very well at keeping their costs stable over the years, I do not foresee a situation where their prices will come down unless they have a sale of some sort.</p>
<p>Your workouts will change over the coming weeks and months, if for no other reason than to keep things fresh and interesting. But the real reason you will want to mix things up down the road is because in terms of muscle strength gains, your body needs a variety of movements in order to  continue progressing.</p>
<p>Whether you get the Super Bench, or some other Bench, I strongly recommend getting a bench of some sort. The Super Bench represents a great value because it is so damn tough and ruggedly built. The padding is dense and firm and offers terrific support, yet it is also extremely comfortable. Moreover, it is more adjustable than any adjustable bench I have ever used. And at the risk of appearing to &#8220;sell you up&#8221;, I strongly encourage you to get Matt to throw in the sit-up attachment. It&#8217;s only like 35.00, and well worth it.</p>
<p>Get back to me with your thoughts and questions.</p>
<p>(PS: Matt is the owner of Ironmaster. When you call Ironmaster, ask to speak to HIM as he has the authority to work deals for you, if any can be worked out. Mention my site. That might help some.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ike</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7005</link>
		<dc:creator>Ike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-7005</guid>
		<description>Interesting site. I came across this from a google search. Like most of the people on here, I wanted to do some good research before dropping that kind of money on adjustable weights. I guess there is a lot to be said for marketing, as Bowflex&#039;s SelectTechs were the first thing that came to mind. It didn&#039;t take long however to see that would be the worst choice of the 3 I&#039;m considering. I think every review I&#039;ve looked at came to that conclusion. So now it is between the PowerBlocks and the Ironmasters. I have to say this thread has mostly convinced me to go with the Ironmasters, also the PowerBlocks just look a little too space-agey for me, and I question how effective it is to do joint-grip overhead triceps extensions with them. I guess my only really question at this point is whether to get the SuperBench and 120lb extension right off the bat. I&#039;m definitely not a workout freak, in fact I&#039;m just starting after several years between any real workout experience, and I decided to go with the P90X program, and while I&#039;m understandably flushed with the new high of working out, I wonder how smart it is to add something like the SuperBench to my purchases already. From a cost-benefit analysis it might seem like the smart thing to do, but I don&#039;t want to spend that kind of money and then have the Bench sitting there un-used because I already have another workout program going that doesn&#039;t call for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting site. I came across this from a google search. Like most of the people on here, I wanted to do some good research before dropping that kind of money on adjustable weights. I guess there is a lot to be said for marketing, as Bowflex&#8217;s SelectTechs were the first thing that came to mind. It didn&#8217;t take long however to see that would be the worst choice of the 3 I&#8217;m considering. I think every review I&#8217;ve looked at came to that conclusion. So now it is between the PowerBlocks and the Ironmasters. I have to say this thread has mostly convinced me to go with the Ironmasters, also the PowerBlocks just look a little too space-agey for me, and I question how effective it is to do joint-grip overhead triceps extensions with them. I guess my only really question at this point is whether to get the SuperBench and 120lb extension right off the bat. I&#8217;m definitely not a workout freak, in fact I&#8217;m just starting after several years between any real workout experience, and I decided to go with the P90X program, and while I&#8217;m understandably flushed with the new high of working out, I wonder how smart it is to add something like the SuperBench to my purchases already. From a cost-benefit analysis it might seem like the smart thing to do, but I don&#8217;t want to spend that kind of money and then have the Bench sitting there un-used because I already have another workout program going that doesn&#8217;t call for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6926</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 04:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6926</guid>
		<description>As a follow-up to my question above, I contacted Matt Dawson at IronMaster.com. It turns out that the handle length is 6.5&quot; after all, which is a good length. the 8&quot; figure they give in the brochure is the length from locking screw to locking screw with no plates on the dumbbell. The 6.5&quot; inch handle length is much more my preference.

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a follow-up to my question above, I contacted Matt Dawson at IronMaster.com. It turns out that the handle length is 6.5&#8243; after all, which is a good length. the 8&#8243; figure they give in the brochure is the length from locking screw to locking screw with no plates on the dumbbell. The 6.5&#8243; inch handle length is much more my preference.</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6847</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6847</guid>
		<description>Duh, sorry. I really muffed that one, Kevin. 

To be honest, the extra-handle length is what I loved about the QL&#039;s. The extra length allowed me to take an off-center grip for times when I wanted to increase weight by only 2.5 pounds. I could add a 2.5 pound plate on one end, leave the other 2.5 pound plate in the stand, so that the dumbbell was off balance by 2.5 pounds. I would then grab the handle off-center and do my sets. This is a feature that must have been built into the design, because I pointed it out to Matt and he suggested that was one of the benefits of the extra length. Of course, the extra length is necessary so that the screws have plenty of handle to screw into, for safety reasons, but having the ability to load a dumbbell with more weight on one end than the other, and still be able to hold it in such a way as to counterbalance it, thus being able to go up in weight in 2.5 pound increments, is awesome. 

That is my take on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duh, sorry. I really muffed that one, Kevin. </p>
<p>To be honest, the extra-handle length is what I loved about the QL&#8217;s. The extra length allowed me to take an off-center grip for times when I wanted to increase weight by only 2.5 pounds. I could add a 2.5 pound plate on one end, leave the other 2.5 pound plate in the stand, so that the dumbbell was off balance by 2.5 pounds. I would then grab the handle off-center and do my sets. This is a feature that must have been built into the design, because I pointed it out to Matt and he suggested that was one of the benefits of the extra length. Of course, the extra length is necessary so that the screws have plenty of handle to screw into, for safety reasons, but having the ability to load a dumbbell with more weight on one end than the other, and still be able to hold it in such a way as to counterbalance it, thus being able to go up in weight in 2.5 pound increments, is awesome. </p>
<p>That is my take on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6845</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:32:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6845</guid>
		<description>Sorry, I hadn&#039;t read the earlier statements referring to the Kettlebell handles (which are GENIUS, by the way). I wasn&#039;t referring to the height of the kettelbell handles, rather I was referring to the grip length of the traditional dumbbell handles. The Ironmaster dumbbell brochure says that the handles (no weight plates) alone are 6.5&quot; high x 6.5&quot; wide x 8&quot; long. Have you noticed the longer length being an issue at all?

Thanks!

Kevin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, I hadn&#8217;t read the earlier statements referring to the Kettlebell handles (which are GENIUS, by the way). I wasn&#8217;t referring to the height of the kettelbell handles, rather I was referring to the grip length of the traditional dumbbell handles. The Ironmaster dumbbell brochure says that the handles (no weight plates) alone are 6.5&#8243; high x 6.5&#8243; wide x 8&#8243; long. Have you noticed the longer length being an issue at all?</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Kevin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6832</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:56:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6832</guid>
		<description>Stay Tuned Guys!

http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2009/03/01/adjustable-kettlebells-from-ironmaster/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stay Tuned Guys!</p>
<p><a href="http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2009/03/01/adjustable-kettlebells-from-ironmaster/" rel="nofollow">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2009/03/01/adjustable-kettlebells-from-ironmaster/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6831</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 06:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6831</guid>
		<description>Hi Kevin. 

Thanks for the compliments! I am glad you enjoy the site. Stay tuned as I have 2-3 product reviews on the way.

As for the handles, I noticed they seemed high as well. I am not sure what the thinking might be, but I think it must have something to do with the screw. That said, I like it. Here is why.

The handles are of a perfect hight to allow for &quot;dumbbell squats&quot;. With a conventional dumbbell or lighter kettlebell, you have to squat down so far to pick them up that it places stress on the lower back and makes it more of a back movement. With these handles, you do not have to squat so deep that it changes the exercise dynamic. You can keep the stress on the thighs, where it belongs. At least that was my initial reaction at first glance.

Of course, a lift is worth a thousand words, and I won&#039;t know anything until I get a chance to try them, and for that I will need to replace the set of QL&#039;s that I lost in the fire.

All in good time.

Cheers
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kevin. </p>
<p>Thanks for the compliments! I am glad you enjoy the site. Stay tuned as I have 2-3 product reviews on the way.</p>
<p>As for the handles, I noticed they seemed high as well. I am not sure what the thinking might be, but I think it must have something to do with the screw. That said, I like it. Here is why.</p>
<p>The handles are of a perfect hight to allow for &#8220;dumbbell squats&#8221;. With a conventional dumbbell or lighter kettlebell, you have to squat down so far to pick them up that it places stress on the lower back and makes it more of a back movement. With these handles, you do not have to squat so deep that it changes the exercise dynamic. You can keep the stress on the thighs, where it belongs. At least that was my initial reaction at first glance.</p>
<p>Of course, a lift is worth a thousand words, and I won&#8217;t know anything until I get a chance to try them, and for that I will need to replace the set of QL&#8217;s that I lost in the fire.</p>
<p>All in good time.</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6830</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 05:54:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6830</guid>
		<description>Again, your reviews are just what we need when it comes to weighing the pros and cons of purchasing something you can&#039;t actually see before you buy it. Your conscientiousness is appreciated.

I have another question to add: I believe that each handle&#039;s grip space is ~8&quot; between plates. I expect that length is necessary given the use of removeable locking screws with varying plate combinations. That said, does that 8 inches between plates feel like a lot of space? Or is the difference in feel/handling between the 8&quot; and a typical 5.25&quot;-6.5&quot; negligible? Thanks, again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, your reviews are just what we need when it comes to weighing the pros and cons of purchasing something you can&#8217;t actually see before you buy it. Your conscientiousness is appreciated.</p>
<p>I have another question to add: I believe that each handle&#8217;s grip space is ~8&#8243; between plates. I expect that length is necessary given the use of removeable locking screws with varying plate combinations. That said, does that 8 inches between plates feel like a lot of space? Or is the difference in feel/handling between the 8&#8243; and a typical 5.25&#8243;-6.5&#8243; negligible? Thanks, again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6829</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 04:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6829</guid>
		<description>Brian, yes it is a reality!

Have a look here:

http://www.samsfitness.com.au/blog/uncategorized/kettlebell-handle-for-ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbells.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, yes it is a reality!</p>
<p>Have a look here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.samsfitness.com.au/blog/uncategorized/kettlebell-handle-for-ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbells.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.samsfitness.com.au/blog/uncategorized/kettlebell-handle-for-ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbells.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6825</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 23:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6825</guid>
		<description>That would certainly be interesting, but I have not heard this before. I work fairly closely with IM, but not so close that I have an inside track on day to day operations. Why not call them and ask?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would certainly be interesting, but I have not heard this before. I work fairly closely with IM, but not so close that I have an inside track on day to day operations. Why not call them and ask?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6824</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 22:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6824</guid>
		<description>Is there any truth to IM developing a kettlebell handle to use with the QL plates?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is there any truth to IM developing a kettlebell handle to use with the QL plates?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6797</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 22:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6797</guid>
		<description>Derek,

I&#039;m going to buy the add-on kit in a month or so.  If you talk to Matt, would you let the forum know what he says about the add-on plate accuracy?  I&#039;m sure they are close to stated weight, and it&#039;s not all that big a deal for me, but I&#039;m just curious.
Thanks.

Dalton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to buy the add-on kit in a month or so.  If you talk to Matt, would you let the forum know what he says about the add-on plate accuracy?  I&#8217;m sure they are close to stated weight, and it&#8217;s not all that big a deal for me, but I&#8217;m just curious.<br />
Thanks.</p>
<p>Dalton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derek</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6792</link>
		<dc:creator>derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6792</guid>
		<description>well, they currently retail for $489. since i see my IM&#039;s as a lifetime investment in my health and as a piece of equioment that should last a VERY long time, i&#039;d probably pay an extra $100 for a set of these that was spot on accurate weight wise. others may feel it is not such an important issue, and it is true that weight is weight, as long as one can measure their progress.

on another note, i long ago needed the add on kit, so will be buying it soon, so ill have to call matt and see how accurate the 22.5 lb plates are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, they currently retail for $489. since i see my IM&#8217;s as a lifetime investment in my health and as a piece of equioment that should last a VERY long time, i&#8217;d probably pay an extra $100 for a set of these that was spot on accurate weight wise. others may feel it is not such an important issue, and it is true that weight is weight, as long as one can measure their progress.</p>
<p>on another note, i long ago needed the add on kit, so will be buying it soon, so ill have to call matt and see how accurate the 22.5 lb plates are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6782</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6782</guid>
		<description>I am thinking about adding a poll for this comment thread to see just how much someone would be willing to pay in order to have an Eleiko quality set of IM dumbbells. 

[I am having some problems with Polldaddy. Grrrrr. Sorry to everyone who voted, but Polldaddy is broken. WIll try SurveyGizmo instead.]

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am thinking about adding a poll for this comment thread to see just how much someone would be willing to pay in order to have an Eleiko quality set of IM dumbbells. </p>
<p>[I am having some problems with Polldaddy. Grrrrr. Sorry to everyone who voted, but Polldaddy is broken. WIll try SurveyGizmo instead.]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6780</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6780</guid>
		<description>Derek, I love comments like yours. This comment thread is one of the most honest you will find on the internet. There is such high praise of the IM QuickLock Dumbbells, but there is also some honest recommendations regarding ways to improve a truly great product.

The concern over the accuracy of the weight is being echoed often enough that I think IM will pay attention to it in the near future. It might not hurt to call IM and voice your suggestions personally, or send an email to IM. Just be polite (as I am sure you would be) and upfront and honest. 

I am glad you enjoy your QL&#039;s in spite of the area in which there needs to be some attention to detail.

Webmeister</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek, I love comments like yours. This comment thread is one of the most honest you will find on the internet. There is such high praise of the IM QuickLock Dumbbells, but there is also some honest recommendations regarding ways to improve a truly great product.</p>
<p>The concern over the accuracy of the weight is being echoed often enough that I think IM will pay attention to it in the near future. It might not hurt to call IM and voice your suggestions personally, or send an email to IM. Just be polite (as I am sure you would be) and upfront and honest. </p>
<p>I am glad you enjoy your QL&#8217;s in spite of the area in which there needs to be some attention to detail.</p>
<p>Webmeister</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derek</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6779</link>
		<dc:creator>derek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6779</guid>
		<description>i have had my IM dumbbells for over a year now. i love them and have become more and more proficient at switching out the plates. i love the solidness of them (one of the main reason i did not go with the powerblocks). if im going to spend $500+, my dumbbells will not rattle! ive got other equpment (power rack, lat machine, crossover machine), but i find as time goes on i find more and more exercises to do w/ dumbbells and enjoy using the IM&#039;s over everything else.

however, i am disappointed to see the accuracy of the weight plates is still off 5%, or close to it. the IM&#039;s are professional feeling in every way, but they are not cheap, and i think a 75 lb dumbbell should be no worse than 1-2% off. powerblocks achieve this. i believe IM can as well. i suppose it would be argued that to get the density of the metal correct would in some way cause a price hike in the dumbbells. personally, id pay a bit more as long as it wasnt exorbitant. nitpicking? maybe. but, it would make me feel better about the product.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have had my IM dumbbells for over a year now. i love them and have become more and more proficient at switching out the plates. i love the solidness of them (one of the main reason i did not go with the powerblocks). if im going to spend $500+, my dumbbells will not rattle! ive got other equpment (power rack, lat machine, crossover machine), but i find as time goes on i find more and more exercises to do w/ dumbbells and enjoy using the IM&#8217;s over everything else.</p>
<p>however, i am disappointed to see the accuracy of the weight plates is still off 5%, or close to it. the IM&#8217;s are professional feeling in every way, but they are not cheap, and i think a 75 lb dumbbell should be no worse than 1-2% off. powerblocks achieve this. i believe IM can as well. i suppose it would be argued that to get the density of the metal correct would in some way cause a price hike in the dumbbells. personally, id pay a bit more as long as it wasnt exorbitant. nitpicking? maybe. but, it would make me feel better about the product.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6752</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6752</guid>
		<description>Just for the record, when I created this entry just over a year ago, I had no idea that it would become the most popular page on this web site. I am really quite grateful to have been of service. I hope this site continues to inspire and encourage. Thanks to everyone who has chimed in with their thoughts.

Webmeistererererer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just for the record, when I created this entry just over a year ago, I had no idea that it would become the most popular page on this web site. I am really quite grateful to have been of service. I hope this site continues to inspire and encourage. Thanks to everyone who has chimed in with their thoughts.</p>
<p>Webmeistererererer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6751</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 23:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6751</guid>
		<description>James R, 

Great post.  I love reading all the different posts on this blog.  For an Ironmaster dumbbell devotee like myself, it&#039;s just very cool.  Thanks to Tim for providing us all with a forum to chat with other Ironmaster users.  I&#039;ve lifted up to 65 lbs. so far, and have weighed each dumbbell on my scale.  For 65 lbs., I get a 62.6 lb. reading, a 2.4 lb. deviation and under 5%.  Not a big deal.  Matt Dawson had a post addressing this very issue in one of the earlier entries, if I&#039;m not mistaken.
As for the weight plate rattle, Tim is right.  All I do is slightly lift one end of the dumbell up at a time (or the entire dumbbell) before starting a set and make sure the locking screw is tight.  I get zero weight plate rattle in my dumbbells.  I have total confidence in the safety of these dumbbells.  Compared with PB or BF, these dumbbells are the safest hands down.

Dalton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James R, </p>
<p>Great post.  I love reading all the different posts on this blog.  For an Ironmaster dumbbell devotee like myself, it&#8217;s just very cool.  Thanks to Tim for providing us all with a forum to chat with other Ironmaster users.  I&#8217;ve lifted up to 65 lbs. so far, and have weighed each dumbbell on my scale.  For 65 lbs., I get a 62.6 lb. reading, a 2.4 lb. deviation and under 5%.  Not a big deal.  Matt Dawson had a post addressing this very issue in one of the earlier entries, if I&#8217;m not mistaken.<br />
As for the weight plate rattle, Tim is right.  All I do is slightly lift one end of the dumbell up at a time (or the entire dumbbell) before starting a set and make sure the locking screw is tight.  I get zero weight plate rattle in my dumbbells.  I have total confidence in the safety of these dumbbells.  Compared with PB or BF, these dumbbells are the safest hands down.</p>
<p>Dalton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6750</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 22:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6750</guid>
		<description>Nice wrtie-up James.

The rattle issue is fairly simple to address. I always grab the dumbbell by both ends and pick it up off the stand a couple of inches, tapping it on the stand once or twice and tightening as I go, just to make sure I have the screws set into place and the plates seating together properly. If there is any looseness at all, this procedure tends to tease it out before I begin my set. Give it a try, and congratulations.

Webmeister</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice wrtie-up James.</p>
<p>The rattle issue is fairly simple to address. I always grab the dumbbell by both ends and pick it up off the stand a couple of inches, tapping it on the stand once or twice and tightening as I go, just to make sure I have the screws set into place and the plates seating together properly. If there is any looseness at all, this procedure tends to tease it out before I begin my set. Give it a try, and congratulations.</p>
<p>Webmeister</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James R</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6748</link>
		<dc:creator>James R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 21:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6748</guid>
		<description>Okay, as part of my New Year&#039;s resolution to get in shape, without the prohibitive cost of a gym (I live in the NYC area and all the gyms around here require insane sign-up fees and cost $75/month or more), I decided I was going to buy adjustable dumbbells, as my apartment is quite small.  So, after doing online research for over a week, I decided on the Quick-lock dumbbells.  I&#039;ve had them for about 3 weeks now, so I feel like I can give a fair review.  So, the question is, did I make the right choice?  Well, I&#039;m not sure.  I&#039;m very happy with the quick-locks, but would I have been happier with powerblocks?  I can&#039;t answer that, but I can give what I think are the pros and cons of the quick-locks.  First, it doesn&#039;t need much repeating, but these dumbbells look and feel great, and they are very tough! There&#039;s something about having them in my room that makes me constantly want to pick them up and throw &#039;em around.  I think I&#039;m gonna see some huge gains because of them!  Perhaps I can&#039;t overvalue this psychological effect.  Second plus is the stand, which is the perfect height for picking the db&#039;s up before a set.  The stand just looks so damn cool too -it looks so expensive that my friends think the total package must have been like $1,000!! Finally, the ability to set these vertically on your thighs before picking them up to do exercise like incline or shoulder presses is great!  (By the way, has anyone tried the new self-spotting attachment that holds dumbbells at shoulder height so you don&#039;t have to have them handed to you? It looks like a great idea, but I wonder if it&#039;s compatible with a Body-Solid bench?),  Now on to the cons.  I knew before I ordered and after reading this site that IM had some problems with plate weight accuracy.  Well, I stepped on the scale with a fully-plated 75 lbs and it was 71.1 lbs.  By my math, 3.75 lbs would be a 5% deviation, so we&#039;re talking a little over 5% here.  Not a huge deal, but also something I think IM should do a better job with.  It seems other companies have nailed the weights down almost exactly.  Another con is that every once in a while (a couple of times per workout) the plates don&#039;t nestle quite perfectly together, causing slight shifting/rattling of the plates.  I don&#039;t feel like I&#039;m in any danger or anything, but it&#039;s not the best feeling in the world to be doing dumbbell presses with weight rattling over head.  Finally, the weight change takes a little time to get used to, but overall is only a slight inconvenience.  Powerblocks would certainly be better in this regard, but I knew that going in. However, the IM website is a little misleading with how quick it makes the weight changes seem. Overall, I&#039;m very happy and if I continue at the  pace I&#039;m at, will need to upgrade to 120lbs very soon!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, as part of my New Year&#8217;s resolution to get in shape, without the prohibitive cost of a gym (I live in the NYC area and all the gyms around here require insane sign-up fees and cost $75/month or more), I decided I was going to buy adjustable dumbbells, as my apartment is quite small.  So, after doing online research for over a week, I decided on the Quick-lock dumbbells.  I&#8217;ve had them for about 3 weeks now, so I feel like I can give a fair review.  So, the question is, did I make the right choice?  Well, I&#8217;m not sure.  I&#8217;m very happy with the quick-locks, but would I have been happier with powerblocks?  I can&#8217;t answer that, but I can give what I think are the pros and cons of the quick-locks.  First, it doesn&#8217;t need much repeating, but these dumbbells look and feel great, and they are very tough! There&#8217;s something about having them in my room that makes me constantly want to pick them up and throw &#8216;em around.  I think I&#8217;m gonna see some huge gains because of them!  Perhaps I can&#8217;t overvalue this psychological effect.  Second plus is the stand, which is the perfect height for picking the db&#8217;s up before a set.  The stand just looks so damn cool too -it looks so expensive that my friends think the total package must have been like $1,000!! Finally, the ability to set these vertically on your thighs before picking them up to do exercise like incline or shoulder presses is great!  (By the way, has anyone tried the new self-spotting attachment that holds dumbbells at shoulder height so you don&#8217;t have to have them handed to you? It looks like a great idea, but I wonder if it&#8217;s compatible with a Body-Solid bench?),  Now on to the cons.  I knew before I ordered and after reading this site that IM had some problems with plate weight accuracy.  Well, I stepped on the scale with a fully-plated 75 lbs and it was 71.1 lbs.  By my math, 3.75 lbs would be a 5% deviation, so we&#8217;re talking a little over 5% here.  Not a huge deal, but also something I think IM should do a better job with.  It seems other companies have nailed the weights down almost exactly.  Another con is that every once in a while (a couple of times per workout) the plates don&#8217;t nestle quite perfectly together, causing slight shifting/rattling of the plates.  I don&#8217;t feel like I&#8217;m in any danger or anything, but it&#8217;s not the best feeling in the world to be doing dumbbell presses with weight rattling over head.  Finally, the weight change takes a little time to get used to, but overall is only a slight inconvenience.  Powerblocks would certainly be better in this regard, but I knew that going in. However, the IM website is a little misleading with how quick it makes the weight changes seem. Overall, I&#8217;m very happy and if I continue at the  pace I&#8217;m at, will need to upgrade to 120lbs very soon!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6743</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 05:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6743</guid>
		<description>d.harry,

It&#039;s really unfortunate you couldn&#039;t acquire a set of IM Quick-Locks.  Powerblocks are nice, but they aren&#039;t as nice as the Ironmaster dumbbells.  I&#039;ve tried them both.  The weight plate rattle with the Powerblocks will drive you absolutely bonkers.  That&#039;s one of the main reasons I went with Ironmaster.  Sam&#039;s Fitness has a website, I believe.  Maybe give that a try.  I also know Sam&#039;s Fitness is on Australia Ebay.  Look them up via that venue.
Personally, if you are going to spend so much money on adjustable dumbbells, I&#039;d do everything I could to get Ironmasters.  Powerblocks are an acceptable alternative, but they are just that.....an alternative to a better product.
Good luck.

Dalton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>d.harry,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s really unfortunate you couldn&#8217;t acquire a set of IM Quick-Locks.  Powerblocks are nice, but they aren&#8217;t as nice as the Ironmaster dumbbells.  I&#8217;ve tried them both.  The weight plate rattle with the Powerblocks will drive you absolutely bonkers.  That&#8217;s one of the main reasons I went with Ironmaster.  Sam&#8217;s Fitness has a website, I believe.  Maybe give that a try.  I also know Sam&#8217;s Fitness is on Australia Ebay.  Look them up via that venue.<br />
Personally, if you are going to spend so much money on adjustable dumbbells, I&#8217;d do everything I could to get Ironmasters.  Powerblocks are an acceptable alternative, but they are just that&#8230;..an alternative to a better product.<br />
Good luck.</p>
<p>Dalton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6740</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6740</guid>
		<description>Harry, I appreciate your replies, but since I am not Ironmaster, and since you have made up your mind that Ironmaster is not the company for you, I have to ask that you send your concerns to Ironmaster. 

Matt does not read this post every day, so expressing your concerns here is not going to generate any change.

it would seem that you have made a good decision based on some cold hard financial realities. The shipping costs for the QuickLock Dumbbells from the USA to India are themselves prohibitive. So, obtain a nice set of Powerblocks and enjoy your workouts:)

As for the reason the UK distributor and Sam&#039;s Fitness are not responding to you, I have no idea. I have no communication with those people. 

Please contact Matt from this point forward regarding those concerns. I think they are legitimate concerns, but I am not able to resolve those concerns. I haven&#039;t the authority. Matt does.

Regards

Timothy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry, I appreciate your replies, but since I am not Ironmaster, and since you have made up your mind that Ironmaster is not the company for you, I have to ask that you send your concerns to Ironmaster. </p>
<p>Matt does not read this post every day, so expressing your concerns here is not going to generate any change.</p>
<p>it would seem that you have made a good decision based on some cold hard financial realities. The shipping costs for the QuickLock Dumbbells from the USA to India are themselves prohibitive. So, obtain a nice set of Powerblocks and enjoy your workouts:)</p>
<p>As for the reason the UK distributor and Sam&#8217;s Fitness are not responding to you, I have no idea. I have no communication with those people. </p>
<p>Please contact Matt from this point forward regarding those concerns. I think they are legitimate concerns, but I am not able to resolve those concerns. I haven&#8217;t the authority. Matt does.</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Timothy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.harry</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6739</link>
		<dc:creator>d.harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 06:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6739</guid>
		<description>Tim, bro the way I see it, I don&#039;t really have a choice. I travel to Europe now and then so the UK is my best bet to buy the IM QLs. But the agent there Valley Fitness seem to be asleep at the switch- they haven&#039;t responded to a single phone call or email, so I wonder if they exist only on paper!? Even the Aussie dealer Sam&#039;s fitness haven&#039;t replied to my email. And I haven&#039;t been able to call them coz they don&#039;t have any phone number listed for international callers, only a domestic toll free number. I want to use this forum to register this problem with IM if anyone&#039;s reading- how come they appoint these dealers who don&#039;t appear to respond?! Are they just not interested in doing business, or is it some deeper issue? I mean, I know the recession is biting folks out there, but when your only dealers seem to be in perpetual slumber then it does cast a negative reflection on the company as a whole- I work in marketing and I know that when our dealers fail to respond to our customers, then the customer is gonna give me an earful.And if I&#039;m still unable to resolve the issue, the business is gonna move elsewhere!Product quality is often secondary to product availability, and the only reason why IM&#039;s competition do any business at all is because IM don&#039;t appear to be too interested in the rest of the world. I mean China and India are the ONLY markets expected to post positive growth figures in these difficult times, so I think its about time IM got its act together and moved in! heck I&#039;m about ready to take on task of being IM&#039;s sole distributor for non-Aussie Asia if needs be. Or let them appoint someone in China , but I want my IM QLs and fast, without getting robbed blind on shipping!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, bro the way I see it, I don&#8217;t really have a choice. I travel to Europe now and then so the UK is my best bet to buy the IM QLs. But the agent there Valley Fitness seem to be asleep at the switch- they haven&#8217;t responded to a single phone call or email, so I wonder if they exist only on paper!? Even the Aussie dealer Sam&#8217;s fitness haven&#8217;t replied to my email. And I haven&#8217;t been able to call them coz they don&#8217;t have any phone number listed for international callers, only a domestic toll free number. I want to use this forum to register this problem with IM if anyone&#8217;s reading- how come they appoint these dealers who don&#8217;t appear to respond?! Are they just not interested in doing business, or is it some deeper issue? I mean, I know the recession is biting folks out there, but when your only dealers seem to be in perpetual slumber then it does cast a negative reflection on the company as a whole- I work in marketing and I know that when our dealers fail to respond to our customers, then the customer is gonna give me an earful.And if I&#8217;m still unable to resolve the issue, the business is gonna move elsewhere!Product quality is often secondary to product availability, and the only reason why IM&#8217;s competition do any business at all is because IM don&#8217;t appear to be too interested in the rest of the world. I mean China and India are the ONLY markets expected to post positive growth figures in these difficult times, so I think its about time IM got its act together and moved in! heck I&#8217;m about ready to take on task of being IM&#8217;s sole distributor for non-Aussie Asia if needs be. Or let them appoint someone in China , but I want my IM QLs and fast, without getting robbed blind on shipping!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6737</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6737</guid>
		<description>Good luck with your Powerblocks Harry. I am sure you will enjoy them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good luck with your Powerblocks Harry. I am sure you will enjoy them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.harry</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6736</link>
		<dc:creator>d.harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6736</guid>
		<description>hi tim- just heard from tim @IM. he said that india is among the more costly places 2 ship- and the  bill for shipping the 75lbs set of IM QLs was an eye-popping $465 for ocean freight! guess the world aint that small after all! and u know who benefits wen IM dont enter the huge market here? Powerblock- thats who! just today i was at a friends place- he has this nice home gym- and he just added Powerblocks. he was not even aware of IMQL. well it does seem like shipping 2 india wud b hard at this point!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi tim- just heard from tim @IM. he said that india is among the more costly places 2 ship- and the  bill for shipping the 75lbs set of IM QLs was an eye-popping $465 for ocean freight! guess the world aint that small after all! and u know who benefits wen IM dont enter the huge market here? Powerblock- thats who! just today i was at a friends place- he has this nice home gym- and he just added Powerblocks. he was not even aware of IMQL. well it does seem like shipping 2 india wud b hard at this point!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6721</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 14:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6721</guid>
		<description>Meh, life goes on mate! I am going to reacquire my tools soon enough. Not sure when or how, but I will continue to enjoy the stuff I currently have, which is still awesome. I am so grateful to have my current setup

http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2009/01/09/lung-disease-home-gyms-workouts-discouragement/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meh, life goes on mate! I am going to reacquire my tools soon enough. Not sure when or how, but I will continue to enjoy the stuff I currently have, which is still awesome. I am so grateful to have my current setup</p>
<p><a href="http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2009/01/09/lung-disease-home-gyms-workouts-discouragement/" rel="nofollow">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2009/01/09/lung-disease-home-gyms-workouts-discouragement/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.harry</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6719</link>
		<dc:creator>d.harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6719</guid>
		<description>Hey Tim, I realize what u went through was terrible. I ought not to have touched upon that. Just pains me that u went thru what u did. 
Anyway, I did not mean to touch on a sensitive issue for you. I lost my own precious home gym and my flat too! this was 5 months ago, and it still keeps me up I still havent been able to forgive my folks for what they did, prolly never will.
While I dont presume to claim that I know what you went thru, I still feel its harder when your own people stab u in the back, as opposed to some outsider. And the fact that I never gauged their intentions makes it harder to stomach, even today. I lost not only my gym stuff, but also the flat I was staying in when my flat got put out for rent. Sometimes I wish the flat had just burned down- that wud have been a better way for my stuff to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tim, I realize what u went through was terrible. I ought not to have touched upon that. Just pains me that u went thru what u did.<br />
Anyway, I did not mean to touch on a sensitive issue for you. I lost my own precious home gym and my flat too! this was 5 months ago, and it still keeps me up I still havent been able to forgive my folks for what they did, prolly never will.<br />
While I dont presume to claim that I know what you went thru, I still feel its harder when your own people stab u in the back, as opposed to some outsider. And the fact that I never gauged their intentions makes it harder to stomach, even today. I lost not only my gym stuff, but also the flat I was staying in when my flat got put out for rent. Sometimes I wish the flat had just burned down- that wud have been a better way for my stuff to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6718</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6718</guid>
		<description>Hey, I am glad you and Matt connected up. I am excited for you. Let&#039;s hope that your goodies will arrive safe and sound and that you can enjoy the dumbbells once and for all.

Take care.

T</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I am glad you and Matt connected up. I am excited for you. Let&#8217;s hope that your goodies will arrive safe and sound and that you can enjoy the dumbbells once and for all.</p>
<p>Take care.</p>
<p>T</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.harry</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6717</link>
		<dc:creator>d.harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6717</guid>
		<description>Hey Tim,
NO reply from the UK or the Aussie distributors! Its amazing, its like they don&#039;t even exist...
I mean, I tried calling the UK guys- Valley Fitness- some 20 times yesterday and all I get is the answering machine! The Aussie guys- Sam&#039;s Fitness- only have a 1-300 number that u can use only inside Australia, so they can only be emailed, which I did, and zero response.
The only bright spot is- Matt Dawson of IM replied to me, so now I hope I can get my IM QLs shipped out from good ol&#039; USofA! At first I was pretty sure of ordering the 75lbs version, buty what with the shipping costs and all, I am prolly gonna go with the 120lbs version, to save on shipping twice ! Mind u, this is my single biggest investment to date, so I&#039;m keen for it to go off without a hitch.Its not the product itself that I worry so much as how safely will it ship, what happens when it lands here, that concerns me. 
I think I have reason to be concerned- my sis in Richmond shipped some cologne back to Mumbai a few months ago. She used snail mail to save on cost and the cologne was stolen clean out of the box when it reached India! Of course her second shipment of Davidoff Cool Water reached me safely, cuz she used UPS, lol!
I also asked Matt to check out if air freight works out cheaper than ocean-freight; sometimes that turns out to be the case! Will keep u posted.
Yeah I did see the video- but right now I have decided to just buy the IM QLs and suspend any other purchases, until I manage to free up some space at home. My existing home gym equipment got SOLD for scrap by my folks while I was in Europe, and I am still to recover from that shock! It prolly don&#039;t compare with your experience of a neighbor burning down your home, but comes pretty close- and I&#039;m not willing to risk having that happen to me again! Any stuff that i buy must be amenable to being locked up in my closet! IMQLs qualify on that account, or else we wouldn&#039;t be having this conversation!
-harry
PS- I hope u had your neighbor locked up for life for what he did to you. I know I would. IMHO better concrete than wood, when it comes to your home. Its harder to torch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Tim,<br />
NO reply from the UK or the Aussie distributors! Its amazing, its like they don&#8217;t even exist&#8230;<br />
I mean, I tried calling the UK guys- Valley Fitness- some 20 times yesterday and all I get is the answering machine! The Aussie guys- Sam&#8217;s Fitness- only have a 1-300 number that u can use only inside Australia, so they can only be emailed, which I did, and zero response.<br />
The only bright spot is- Matt Dawson of IM replied to me, so now I hope I can get my IM QLs shipped out from good ol&#8217; USofA! At first I was pretty sure of ordering the 75lbs version, buty what with the shipping costs and all, I am prolly gonna go with the 120lbs version, to save on shipping twice ! Mind u, this is my single biggest investment to date, so I&#8217;m keen for it to go off without a hitch.Its not the product itself that I worry so much as how safely will it ship, what happens when it lands here, that concerns me.<br />
I think I have reason to be concerned- my sis in Richmond shipped some cologne back to Mumbai a few months ago. She used snail mail to save on cost and the cologne was stolen clean out of the box when it reached India! Of course her second shipment of Davidoff Cool Water reached me safely, cuz she used UPS, lol!<br />
I also asked Matt to check out if air freight works out cheaper than ocean-freight; sometimes that turns out to be the case! Will keep u posted.<br />
Yeah I did see the video- but right now I have decided to just buy the IM QLs and suspend any other purchases, until I manage to free up some space at home. My existing home gym equipment got SOLD for scrap by my folks while I was in Europe, and I am still to recover from that shock! It prolly don&#8217;t compare with your experience of a neighbor burning down your home, but comes pretty close- and I&#8217;m not willing to risk having that happen to me again! Any stuff that i buy must be amenable to being locked up in my closet! IMQLs qualify on that account, or else we wouldn&#8217;t be having this conversation!<br />
-harry<br />
PS- I hope u had your neighbor locked up for life for what he did to you. I know I would. IMHO better concrete than wood, when it comes to your home. Its harder to torch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6712</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6712</guid>
		<description>Hi Harry. Interesting comments. When Ironmaster says they use &quot;bushings&quot;, I am not sure what they are referring to, unless it&#039;s the silicone bushing that is a LINER inside the moving bar that slides up and down the post-beams. The two vertical posts that the barbell slides up and down on also have a silicone bushing or sheath as well that encases the steel tubing I think, creating a friction-less surface to surface contact. In that case, I would have to say that the large silicone sheath or &quot;bushing&quot; would be superior to linear bearings in terms of durability. Linear bearings wear down over time, the silicone sheath bushing wouldn&#039;t. Anyway, talk to Matt about this. I am sure they looked into linear bearings and decided against them for the reasons I just mentioned.  OK I haver to run some errands for the day. I will get back to you when I can. Keep me posted.

As and aside, I wish I had personal experience with the IM2000. I have always wanted one, but money is not something I have an abundance of currently. 

Did you happen to see the video and link on the page I linked to above? Is it easier to import from Australia than it is from the USA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Harry. Interesting comments. When Ironmaster says they use &#8220;bushings&#8221;, I am not sure what they are referring to, unless it&#8217;s the silicone bushing that is a LINER inside the moving bar that slides up and down the post-beams. The two vertical posts that the barbell slides up and down on also have a silicone bushing or sheath as well that encases the steel tubing I think, creating a friction-less surface to surface contact. In that case, I would have to say that the large silicone sheath or &#8220;bushing&#8221; would be superior to linear bearings in terms of durability. Linear bearings wear down over time, the silicone sheath bushing wouldn&#8217;t. Anyway, talk to Matt about this. I am sure they looked into linear bearings and decided against them for the reasons I just mentioned.  OK I haver to run some errands for the day. I will get back to you when I can. Keep me posted.</p>
<p>As and aside, I wish I had personal experience with the IM2000. I have always wanted one, but money is not something I have an abundance of currently. </p>
<p>Did you happen to see the video and link on the page I linked to above? Is it easier to import from Australia than it is from the USA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.harry</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6711</link>
		<dc:creator>d.harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6711</guid>
		<description>No, I have not yet bought the series7. just thinking of doing so. the ONLY thing i am SURE of buying is the IM QL and that I simply cannot get a hold of lol !
So here&#039;s the thing- I am aware of the IM 2000. But when I phoned IM some 4-5 months ago, they told me it wud be uneconomical to ship to India. I guess he was right, but oddly enough I think the total cost of importing the IM 2000 wud still be LESS than the $3200 price of buying the Bodysolid series 7 !!
Now another concern about the IM 2000 is- IM specify that they have used BUSHINGS on the IM2000. I know for a fact that bushings are inferior to LINEAR BEARINGS, which can be found on the series7 among others. Thats one reason I think the series7 would win over the IM2000.That and the fabulous lifetime warranty that Bodysolid offer on EVERYTHING! On all other fronts, IM2000 comes up tops- its half the price, occupies less space, etc.I am not certain of the warranty of IM, but still I&#039;m certain of buying the IM QL dumbells, and thats a start!
-harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, I have not yet bought the series7. just thinking of doing so. the ONLY thing i am SURE of buying is the IM QL and that I simply cannot get a hold of lol !<br />
So here&#8217;s the thing- I am aware of the IM 2000. But when I phoned IM some 4-5 months ago, they told me it wud be uneconomical to ship to India. I guess he was right, but oddly enough I think the total cost of importing the IM 2000 wud still be LESS than the $3200 price of buying the Bodysolid series 7 !!<br />
Now another concern about the IM 2000 is- IM specify that they have used BUSHINGS on the IM2000. I know for a fact that bushings are inferior to LINEAR BEARINGS, which can be found on the series7 among others. Thats one reason I think the series7 would win over the IM2000.That and the fabulous lifetime warranty that Bodysolid offer on EVERYTHING! On all other fronts, IM2000 comes up tops- its half the price, occupies less space, etc.I am not certain of the warranty of IM, but still I&#8217;m certain of buying the IM QL dumbells, and thats a start!<br />
-harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6710</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6710</guid>
		<description>Hi Harry.

I reply to comments as fast as I can. I am deeply indebted to you, my readers, so where possible I like to respond immediately.

I have no experience with the Series 7, but before you buy it (assuming you have not already done so) have a look at this page and photo gallery:

http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2009/01/26/ironmaster-im2000-self-spotting-system-review/

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Harry.</p>
<p>I reply to comments as fast as I can. I am deeply indebted to you, my readers, so where possible I like to respond immediately.</p>
<p>I have no experience with the Series 7, but before you buy it (assuming you have not already done so) have a look at this page and photo gallery:</p>
<p><a href="http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2009/01/26/ironmaster-im2000-self-spotting-system-review/" rel="nofollow">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2009/01/26/ironmaster-im2000-self-spotting-system-review/</a></p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.harry</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6709</link>
		<dc:creator>d.harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6709</guid>
		<description>by the way do u have any experience with the BodySolid Series 7 smith gym? Or can u direct me to someone who does? I dont wanna shell out $3200 and then feel ripped off. thanks!
-harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way do u have any experience with the BodySolid Series 7 smith gym? Or can u direct me to someone who does? I dont wanna shell out $3200 and then feel ripped off. thanks!<br />
-harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.harry</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6708</link>
		<dc:creator>d.harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 15:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6708</guid>
		<description>Dear Tim
Wow u replied to my post within 8 minutes! I am amazed at you, bro- what on earth r u doing awake at 7 am lol ! Okay so I was staying back at my office so that I could call up IM, but seeing as how they r gonna open only by 9AM PST, that means 10.30PM in India! Guess I better get home and call, and see what they say. In the meantime I managed to dash off two emails- one each to the UK and Aussie distributors. I guess I&#039;m really keen to get a hold of the QL dumbells! Will let u know in case anyone replies. Its at times like these that I wish I was somewhere in the lower 48! Anywho, I managed to find the Series 7 here, so I guess no harm done, except I part with an arm and a leg for the series7, and lose the other arm and leg trying to import the QL!! Thats life I suppose- cheers, Harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tim<br />
Wow u replied to my post within 8 minutes! I am amazed at you, bro- what on earth r u doing awake at 7 am lol ! Okay so I was staying back at my office so that I could call up IM, but seeing as how they r gonna open only by 9AM PST, that means 10.30PM in India! Guess I better get home and call, and see what they say. In the meantime I managed to dash off two emails- one each to the UK and Aussie distributors. I guess I&#8217;m really keen to get a hold of the QL dumbells! Will let u know in case anyone replies. Its at times like these that I wish I was somewhere in the lower 48! Anywho, I managed to find the Series 7 here, so I guess no harm done, except I part with an arm and a leg for the series7, and lose the other arm and leg trying to import the QL!! Thats life I suppose- cheers, Harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6707</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6707</guid>
		<description>Harry, thanks for getting back to me. On Saturday, Ironmaster is closed. I think many businesses of this nature are typically closed on Saturday and Sunday. Retail stores are usually open, because here in America weekends are when they make most of their money. However, Ironmaster is not a retail store in the same way. I will also email Matt or maybe even call him to alert him to your email. As for the UK distributor, I am unable to speak to that, but once you and Matt are communicating I am sure the ball will get rolling. 

Also, here is another number: International: 425-408-9040

They open at 9 AM West Coast Time.

Do not worry. I have found IM to be top drawer with respect to customer service.

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry, thanks for getting back to me. On Saturday, Ironmaster is closed. I think many businesses of this nature are typically closed on Saturday and Sunday. Retail stores are usually open, because here in America weekends are when they make most of their money. However, Ironmaster is not a retail store in the same way. I will also email Matt or maybe even call him to alert him to your email. As for the UK distributor, I am unable to speak to that, but once you and Matt are communicating I am sure the ball will get rolling. </p>
<p>Also, here is another number: International: 425-408-9040</p>
<p>They open at 9 AM West Coast Time.</p>
<p>Do not worry. I have found IM to be top drawer with respect to customer service.</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.harry</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6706</link>
		<dc:creator>d.harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6706</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>**************Posting again in case u missed the first one!*******************************<br />
Dear Tim<br />
I emailed Matt on Saturday. Seeing as how its already Monday night here in India and I still haven’t gotten a reply from Matt yet, what should I do?<br />
I also tried calling the UK distributor but nobody answers the call! If its so hard to even place my order, then what’s after sales service gonna be like? I realize that being in India isn’t helping, but come on, if I’m able to buy a BodySolid Series 7 then it can’t be that hard to buy an IM QL !!<br />
Can u help me out here? I really like the product. Maybe u can start by giving me Matt’s cellphone number? The 1-800 number u gave me works ONLY in the US and maybe Canada <img src='http://totalphysiqueonline.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> (<br />
-harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.harry</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6705</link>
		<dc:creator>d.harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6705</guid>
		<description>Dear Tim
I emailed Matt on Saturday. Seeing as how its already Monday night here in India and I still haven&#039;t gotten a reply from Matt yet, what should I do?
I also tried calling the UK distributor but nobody answers the call! If its so hard to even place my order, then what&#039;s after sales service gonna  be like? I realize that being in India isn&#039;t helping, but come on, if I&#039;m able to buy a BodySolid Series 7 then it can&#039;t be that hard to buy an IM QL !!
Can u help me out here? I really like the product. Maybe u can start by giving me Matt&#039;s cellphone number? The 1-800 number u gave me works ONLY in the US and maybe Canada :((
-harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Tim<br />
I emailed Matt on Saturday. Seeing as how its already Monday night here in India and I still haven&#8217;t gotten a reply from Matt yet, what should I do?<br />
I also tried calling the UK distributor but nobody answers the call! If its so hard to even place my order, then what&#8217;s after sales service gonna  be like? I realize that being in India isn&#8217;t helping, but come on, if I&#8217;m able to buy a BodySolid Series 7 then it can&#8217;t be that hard to buy an IM QL !!<br />
Can u help me out here? I really like the product. Maybe u can start by giving me Matt&#8217;s cellphone number? The 1-800 number u gave me works ONLY in the US and maybe Canada <img src='http://totalphysiqueonline.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> (<br />
-harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6697</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6697</guid>
		<description>Boy oh boy, this just made my day. The last two weeks have been a huge challenge getting the site up and running. I will be taking a short break, but I will be back to my duties in about a week. I sent you an email blast, did you get it by any chance?

Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy oh boy, this just made my day. The last two weeks have been a huge challenge getting the site up and running. I will be taking a short break, but I will be back to my duties in about a week. I sent you an email blast, did you get it by any chance?</p>
<p>Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6696</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 23:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6696</guid>
		<description>Tim, I heard about your site- probably like so many others by researching the IM dumbbells. I have to say your site was very informative and your review  was excellent- pictures especially. Its not like the Ironmaster website was not informative ( great site and they will send you a free dvd of all their products if you ask on their website).but its always nice to see real-world reviews by regular people. keep up the good work.
Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim, I heard about your site- probably like so many others by researching the IM dumbbells. I have to say your site was very informative and your review  was excellent- pictures especially. Its not like the Ironmaster website was not informative ( great site and they will send you a free dvd of all their products if you ask on their website).but its always nice to see real-world reviews by regular people. keep up the good work.<br />
Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6695</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6695</guid>
		<description>Brian, thanks for the input...I think this page says it all for the QL&#039;s.
webmeister</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian, thanks for the input&#8230;I think this page says it all for the QL&#8217;s.<br />
webmeister</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6694</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6694</guid>
		<description>Harry thanks for the compliments.

Matt can be emailed at  Matt Dawson &lt;matt@ironmaster.com&gt;

Alternately, you can dial toll free 800-533-3339

Hope this helps and good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harry thanks for the compliments.</p>
<p>Matt can be emailed at  Matt Dawson <matt @ironmaster.com></p>
<p>Alternately, you can dial toll free 800-533-3339</p>
<p>Hope this helps and good luck.</matt></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6693</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6693</guid>
		<description>I love the IM dumbbells. I agree with everything everyone has said about them. I have the 120 lb set, and I have the Powerblock 90 lb set. They both have their attributes, and I would hate to part with either. If I had to choose between the two I would go with the IM. The ONLY area Powerblocks wins in is speed of weight change. As far as form,function,durability, and visual appeal the IM comes out on top.

Brian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the IM dumbbells. I agree with everything everyone has said about them. I have the 120 lb set, and I have the Powerblock 90 lb set. They both have their attributes, and I would hate to part with either. If I had to choose between the two I would go with the IM. The ONLY area Powerblocks wins in is speed of weight change. As far as form,function,durability, and visual appeal the IM comes out on top.</p>
<p>Brian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: d.harry</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6692</link>
		<dc:creator>d.harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 20:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6692</guid>
		<description>great site. came across u as i googled 4 adjustable dumbells. i live in Asia- specifically bombay, india- or mumbai as its now known. this comes from the heart- 4 a long time i have been unhappy with my gym here- its too small, too crowded and of late its begun to depress me -to the point i m desperate to invest in my own home gym! i m gonna buy a Body solid series 7 gym, which i can get in mumbai for US $3200. i know thats expensive! i also wanna buy the IM QL dumbells- my question is- if i had to choose bw these two what do i opt for? my problem is that i cant locate any dealer for IM here! import duty in india is about 25% of TOTAL GROSS VALUE of the shipment., and that includes cost of shipping and insurance. i wud b grateful to get the contact details of IM  s owner- mark?- i gotta talk to him and work out a decent rate for shipping ! cud someone help? thanks., harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great site. came across u as i googled 4 adjustable dumbells. i live in Asia- specifically bombay, india- or mumbai as its now known. this comes from the heart- 4 a long time i have been unhappy with my gym here- its too small, too crowded and of late its begun to depress me -to the point i m desperate to invest in my own home gym! i m gonna buy a Body solid series 7 gym, which i can get in mumbai for US $3200. i know thats expensive! i also wanna buy the IM QL dumbells- my question is- if i had to choose bw these two what do i opt for? my problem is that i cant locate any dealer for IM here! import duty in india is about 25% of TOTAL GROSS VALUE of the shipment., and that includes cost of shipping and insurance. i wud b grateful to get the contact details of IM  s owner- mark?- i gotta talk to him and work out a decent rate for shipping ! cud someone help? thanks., harry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6691</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6691</guid>
		<description>Tim (that&#039;s also my name) thanks for taking the time to leave such an in-depth comment. Thank you for stopping by the site as well. How did you hear about TPO?

Keep training hard, and keep us posted with your experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim (that&#8217;s also my name) thanks for taking the time to leave such an in-depth comment. Thank you for stopping by the site as well. How did you hear about TPO?</p>
<p>Keep training hard, and keep us posted with your experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6690</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6690</guid>
		<description>I bought a set of the IM dumbbells a few weeks ago. I actually had a full set of pro-style dumbbells that I sold before I picked up the IMs set. It was tough letting go of an entire set of dumbbells (5-110lbs) but I needed to free up some space in my home gym. So far I do not regret the decision. The only down side for me using the adjustable&#039;s would be I sacrifice some convince of being able to just grab the next pair of dumbbells on the rack. That said- the quicklocks have proven to be a really nice addition to my gym. They are rock solid- I love the grip and they take up virtually no room. I also bought the 120 lb add on kit as well. I am still getting use to changing out the plates- I would honestly say it does take a little time, especially when you get up to 90lbs and over- but so far its no big deal. The rack is a perfect height and hold everything nicely. I am probably going to extend part of my home gym in the near future- and moving the IM set will be alot easier than two full racks of dumbbells!. I work out hard- I don&#039;t baby my equipment and the IM set fits right in- very durable and I am not afraid that they will break. I would recommend these for anyone looking for an adjustable set of dumbbells. Another big selling point is they feel like traditional dumbbells which I have come used to over the years. i don&#039;t like the foam grip of some of the competitors- I like a solid knurled handle on my dumbbells. Thats my 2-cents. 
Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bought a set of the IM dumbbells a few weeks ago. I actually had a full set of pro-style dumbbells that I sold before I picked up the IMs set. It was tough letting go of an entire set of dumbbells (5-110lbs) but I needed to free up some space in my home gym. So far I do not regret the decision. The only down side for me using the adjustable&#8217;s would be I sacrifice some convince of being able to just grab the next pair of dumbbells on the rack. That said- the quicklocks have proven to be a really nice addition to my gym. They are rock solid- I love the grip and they take up virtually no room. I also bought the 120 lb add on kit as well. I am still getting use to changing out the plates- I would honestly say it does take a little time, especially when you get up to 90lbs and over- but so far its no big deal. The rack is a perfect height and hold everything nicely. I am probably going to extend part of my home gym in the near future- and moving the IM set will be alot easier than two full racks of dumbbells!. I work out hard- I don&#8217;t baby my equipment and the IM set fits right in- very durable and I am not afraid that they will break. I would recommend these for anyone looking for an adjustable set of dumbbells. Another big selling point is they feel like traditional dumbbells which I have come used to over the years. i don&#8217;t like the foam grip of some of the competitors- I like a solid knurled handle on my dumbbells. Thats my 2-cents.<br />
Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6581</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6581</guid>
		<description>Hey Mongcong,

I&#039;m from Guelph and Fitness Equipment of Ottawa quoted me $620 with $75 in shipping. How did you get such a good deal!?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mongcong,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m from Guelph and Fitness Equipment of Ottawa quoted me $620 with $75 in shipping. How did you get such a good deal!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6564</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 23:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6564</guid>
		<description>Hi David,

When I ordered my stuff, Matt was very accommodating.  I ordered the dumbbells, bench, crunch attachment, and 4X6 rubberized floor mat.  Even though the floor mat wasn&#039;t included in any package deals, he worked it in for me.  I got a 5% Holiday discount, too (that discount is no longer running).  Came to $855, I believe.  Make sure you directly talk to Matt.  If Tim or Scott answers the phone, ask for Matt.  If he&#039;s not available, I&#039;d just keep calling back until you talked directly to him.  He&#039;ll take your order, as he did mine.

As for the crunch attachment, it IS so good that it will make you want to do the decline crunch situps.  The attachment enables you to really target your midsection, more so than traditional situps.  You want this attachment, David.  Trust me.  For what you get, it&#039;s well worth it and not that much more in terms of cost.  You can also do the decline bench press, as well.

Hope this helps.

Dalton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David,</p>
<p>When I ordered my stuff, Matt was very accommodating.  I ordered the dumbbells, bench, crunch attachment, and 4X6 rubberized floor mat.  Even though the floor mat wasn&#8217;t included in any package deals, he worked it in for me.  I got a 5% Holiday discount, too (that discount is no longer running).  Came to $855, I believe.  Make sure you directly talk to Matt.  If Tim or Scott answers the phone, ask for Matt.  If he&#8217;s not available, I&#8217;d just keep calling back until you talked directly to him.  He&#8217;ll take your order, as he did mine.</p>
<p>As for the crunch attachment, it IS so good that it will make you want to do the decline crunch situps.  The attachment enables you to really target your midsection, more so than traditional situps.  You want this attachment, David.  Trust me.  For what you get, it&#8217;s well worth it and not that much more in terms of cost.  You can also do the decline bench press, as well.</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
<p>Dalton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6563</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6563</guid>
		<description>When I order, I&#039;ll call and see if I can get the crunch attachment at a discount with Package 1.  Package 2 includes the crunch attachment as well as the dip bar attachment (for $67 more than package 1--for comparison, the crunch attachment by itself goes for $55 and the dip bar attachment goes for $49).

I definitely would like to get the crunch attachment.  Here&#039;s the real question: is the attachment so good that it&#039;ll make me want to do them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I order, I&#8217;ll call and see if I can get the crunch attachment at a discount with Package 1.  Package 2 includes the crunch attachment as well as the dip bar attachment (for $67 more than package 1&#8211;for comparison, the crunch attachment by itself goes for $55 and the dip bar attachment goes for $49).</p>
<p>I definitely would like to get the crunch attachment.  Here&#8217;s the real question: is the attachment so good that it&#8217;ll make me want to do them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6546</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 04:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6546</guid>
		<description>For your viewing pleasure.

				   &lt;object type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; style=&quot;width:425px; height:334px;&quot; data=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/9Dw105s6UiU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&quot;&gt;&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/9Dw105s6UiU&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&quot; /&gt;&lt;/object&gt;


&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ironmaster.com/store/home.php?partner=totalphysique&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Visit Ironmaster to place your order today!&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For your viewing pleasure.</p>
<p>				   <object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" style="width:425px; height:334px;" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/9Dw105s6UiU&#038;hl=en&amp;fs=1"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/9Dw105s6UiU&#038;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /></object></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ironmaster.com/store/home.php?partner=totalphysique" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"><strong>Visit Ironmaster to place your order today!</strong></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6545</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 04:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6545</guid>
		<description>Stew and David,

My pleasure.  Glad I could help.  I think you two will really like IM dumbbells.  I know I do.  Even though they aren&#039;t as drop dead quick to change as PB, they more than make up for it with their inherent stability, durability, aesthetics (they really are very attractive dumbbells---very sophisticated), and feel.  Looks like Matt made a nice new video on YouTube about the QuickLocks.  You can reference the video on the IronMaster site, as well.  Pretty neat.

Get the crunch attachment, David.  You&#039;ll be sorry if you don&#039;t.  Incline situps are amazing using this device.  I use it almost every day.   Since you are buying all this stuff, ask Matt for a package deal.  Cheese and crackers, wish my employer would have given me $800 to buy my Ironmasters.  That&#039;s just not fair!  Ha.

Let us all know how you like your dumbbells once you spend some time with them.  Don&#039;t forget that you&#039;ll need a couple wrenches for assembly (for the bench legs and to get the plastic off the padded part of the bench) once everything arrives.  Like the dumbbells, the bench is rock solid.

Take care.

Dalton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stew and David,</p>
<p>My pleasure.  Glad I could help.  I think you two will really like IM dumbbells.  I know I do.  Even though they aren&#8217;t as drop dead quick to change as PB, they more than make up for it with their inherent stability, durability, aesthetics (they really are very attractive dumbbells&#8212;very sophisticated), and feel.  Looks like Matt made a nice new video on YouTube about the QuickLocks.  You can reference the video on the IronMaster site, as well.  Pretty neat.</p>
<p>Get the crunch attachment, David.  You&#8217;ll be sorry if you don&#8217;t.  Incline situps are amazing using this device.  I use it almost every day.   Since you are buying all this stuff, ask Matt for a package deal.  Cheese and crackers, wish my employer would have given me $800 to buy my Ironmasters.  That&#8217;s just not fair!  Ha.</p>
<p>Let us all know how you like your dumbbells once you spend some time with them.  Don&#8217;t forget that you&#8217;ll need a couple wrenches for assembly (for the bench legs and to get the plastic off the padded part of the bench) once everything arrives.  Like the dumbbells, the bench is rock solid.</p>
<p>Take care.</p>
<p>Dalton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6544</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6544</guid>
		<description>Dalton, thanks also for your comments.  There are plenty of reviews out there on individual products, but the comments on this page was the only place I was able to find anyone with experience (as opposed to just having a biased opinion) that compared products from different companies.  Obviously, the comments on this page swing heavily in favor of the Ironmaster QL&#039;s, but the most valuable comments are those that can provide details as to why that preference is justified.

And I appreciate your mention of the crunch attachment to the super bench.  I&#039;m seriously considering adding it to my purchase, even though it puts the cost slightly over my $800 budget.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dalton, thanks also for your comments.  There are plenty of reviews out there on individual products, but the comments on this page was the only place I was able to find anyone with experience (as opposed to just having a biased opinion) that compared products from different companies.  Obviously, the comments on this page swing heavily in favor of the Ironmaster QL&#8217;s, but the most valuable comments are those that can provide details as to why that preference is justified.</p>
<p>And I appreciate your mention of the crunch attachment to the super bench.  I&#8217;m seriously considering adding it to my purchase, even though it puts the cost slightly over my $800 budget.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6543</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6543</guid>
		<description>Oh yeah, lol, thats right I forgot. You are a Canadian!  My best friend is in Abbottsford BC. The Canadian people are SO wonderful. I love you guys. The kindest folks on the planet live in the Great White North.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah, lol, thats right I forgot. You are a Canadian!  My best friend is in Abbottsford BC. The Canadian people are SO wonderful. I love you guys. The kindest folks on the planet live in the Great White North.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stewie griffin</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6542</link>
		<dc:creator>stewie griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6542</guid>
		<description>sure thing, I will be placing my order through a Canadian distributor.
But I can place a quick call to IM to let them know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure thing, I will be placing my order through a Canadian distributor.<br />
But I can place a quick call to IM to let them know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6541</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6541</guid>
		<description>Stew, may I ask a favor? If you decide to go ahead with your purchase next week, please do so by letting IM know how you came to your decision. Moreover, if you order from the IM store, go there by using the following link as it helps IM determine the effectiveness of this site in driving traffic their way:

http://www.ironmaster.com/store/home.php?partner=totalphysique

Thanks in advance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stew, may I ask a favor? If you decide to go ahead with your purchase next week, please do so by letting IM know how you came to your decision. Moreover, if you order from the IM store, go there by using the following link as it helps IM determine the effectiveness of this site in driving traffic their way:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ironmaster.com/store/home.php?partner=totalphysique" rel="nofollow">http://www.ironmaster.com/store/home.php?partner=totalphysique</a></p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6540</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6540</guid>
		<description>Dalton I want to say thank you as well. Everyone has made the particular page so very helpful to others who are on the fence, so to speak.

Stew, PLEASE let us know what you think once you get your IM QL&#039;s. If you have ANY issues at all, let us know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dalton I want to say thank you as well. Everyone has made the particular page so very helpful to others who are on the fence, so to speak.</p>
<p>Stew, PLEASE let us know what you think once you get your IM QL&#8217;s. If you have ANY issues at all, let us know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stewie griffin</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6539</link>
		<dc:creator>stewie griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 15:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6539</guid>
		<description>Dalton,

I really appreciate your response. Reading all your previous posts, which communicated some of the issues I had, really helped to allay my concerns.

No doubt now, I&#039;ve decided that I will be be picking up a pair of the QLs next week. 

sg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dalton,</p>
<p>I really appreciate your response. Reading all your previous posts, which communicated some of the issues I had, really helped to allay my concerns.</p>
<p>No doubt now, I&#8217;ve decided that I will be be picking up a pair of the QLs next week. </p>
<p>sg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6535</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 09:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6535</guid>
		<description>Steve, you realize that this web site is not the Ironmaster QL official web page. right? When you spoke of seeing a white stand I had no idea what you were talking about. I had to guess that you were referring to the IM official page. LOL Anyway, that video has been around for some time. I got my set towards the end of 2006 I believe. My stand was grey. I have assumed they were all grey. 

I know that the IM Super Bench is now a grey color based on the web site, leading me to believe that they changed the color of the bench to match the stand. Why not just call IM yourself and ask :D

--------------------------

Dalton, GREAT post. Very informative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, you realize that this web site is not the Ironmaster QL official web page. right? When you spoke of seeing a white stand I had no idea what you were talking about. I had to guess that you were referring to the IM official page. LOL Anyway, that video has been around for some time. I got my set towards the end of 2006 I believe. My stand was grey. I have assumed they were all grey. </p>
<p>I know that the IM Super Bench is now a grey color based on the web site, leading me to believe that they changed the color of the bench to match the stand. Why not just call IM yourself and ask <img src='http://totalphysiqueonline.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p>Dalton, GREAT post. Very informative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6534</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 09:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6534</guid>
		<description>stewie griffin,

Tough choice.  I, too, had a difficult time deciding between Powerblocks and Ironmasters.  In the end, as my earlier post indicates, I chose Ironmaster QL dumbbells.  I&#039;ve been working out with them for a month or so now and I have not had any issue whatsoever with the QL screws.  They are perfect and completely safe.  I feel 100% safe using these dumbbells, whereas with the Powerblocks if you insert the pin wrong you might have problems with the weight stack detaching.

I&#039;ve worked out with Powerblocks, Soloflex adjustable dumbbells, Freemotion adjustable dumbbells, and Blowflex adjustable dumbbells, and I can honestly say Ironmaster is the superior dumbbell.  Rapidity of weight change with the Powerblocks is extremely attractive, but the deal breaker came when I actually tried them.  The weight plate rattle was the straw that broke the camel&#039;s back.  There&#039;s also a qualitative difference in the feel of Ironmasters and PBs.  In this regard, IM is the clear winner.  In the end (if you go with IM), you will sacrifrice extreme rapidity of weight change for durability and superior aesthetics and feel, and it&#039;s worth it.  At least in my opinion....

I love these dumbbells.  And the Superbench is great (the crunch attachment is a must).

Hope this helps.

Dalton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>stewie griffin,</p>
<p>Tough choice.  I, too, had a difficult time deciding between Powerblocks and Ironmasters.  In the end, as my earlier post indicates, I chose Ironmaster QL dumbbells.  I&#8217;ve been working out with them for a month or so now and I have not had any issue whatsoever with the QL screws.  They are perfect and completely safe.  I feel 100% safe using these dumbbells, whereas with the Powerblocks if you insert the pin wrong you might have problems with the weight stack detaching.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve worked out with Powerblocks, Soloflex adjustable dumbbells, Freemotion adjustable dumbbells, and Blowflex adjustable dumbbells, and I can honestly say Ironmaster is the superior dumbbell.  Rapidity of weight change with the Powerblocks is extremely attractive, but the deal breaker came when I actually tried them.  The weight plate rattle was the straw that broke the camel&#8217;s back.  There&#8217;s also a qualitative difference in the feel of Ironmasters and PBs.  In this regard, IM is the clear winner.  In the end (if you go with IM), you will sacrifrice extreme rapidity of weight change for durability and superior aesthetics and feel, and it&#8217;s worth it.  At least in my opinion&#8230;.</p>
<p>I love these dumbbells.  And the Superbench is great (the crunch attachment is a must).</p>
<p>Hope this helps.</p>
<p>Dalton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6532</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 04:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6532</guid>
		<description>http://www.ironmaster.com/store/home.php#

right hand side, top video</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.ironmaster.com/store/home.php#" rel="nofollow">http://www.ironmaster.com/store/home.php#</a></p>
<p>right hand side, top video</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6530</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 02:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6530</guid>
		<description>I am a tad confused. What white stand do you see in the photos above? I am wondering if you might have mistaken something. I have only seen grey stands. I am not sure of what you are referencing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a tad confused. What white stand do you see in the photos above? I am wondering if you might have mistaken something. I have only seen grey stands. I am not sure of what you are referencing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6529</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 02:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6529</guid>
		<description>QL stand question. I see there are 2 stand colors... grey and white. does one represent a later production run of the QLs dumbbells. Matt from IM told my buddy that they recently (not sure what period this meant) raised the standards on their DBs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>QL stand question. I see there are 2 stand colors&#8230; grey and white. does one represent a later production run of the QLs dumbbells. Matt from IM told my buddy that they recently (not sure what period this meant) raised the standards on their DBs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stewie griffin</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6521</link>
		<dc:creator>stewie griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 20:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6521</guid>
		<description>Good Points that you brought up, I narrowed down my choices to the QL and PB.

Leaning more heavily towards the QL. All in the QL (75lbs) will cost me CAD$820! same as the PB 9.0 + the extension to 90lbs (without the stand). I just want to hammer through all the points before I decide..  I tried to take advantage of the 30day trial, to ease my mind, but IronMaster doesn&#039;t offer this to Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Points that you brought up, I narrowed down my choices to the QL and PB.</p>
<p>Leaning more heavily towards the QL. All in the QL (75lbs) will cost me CAD$820! same as the PB 9.0 + the extension to 90lbs (without the stand). I just want to hammer through all the points before I decide..  I tried to take advantage of the 30day trial, to ease my mind, but IronMaster doesn&#8217;t offer this to Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6520</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:59:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6520</guid>
		<description>Stew you are welcome. 

I really think that this is a good time to call Ironmaster. If Matt is not able to address your concerns adequately then I really think the Powerblocks should be your choice. However, talk to Matt. Perhaps Ironmaster has addressed the issues of the screws.

Also, if you think that the lack of close tolerances reflects poorly in a company, then this is personal red flag you should respect. Don&#039;t ignore your own instincts. Go with what brings you the most peace. Don&#039;t buy something of this nature if you are not 100% sure of it. You live in Canada, and you can ill afford to get something you end up not liking.

That said, I think these comments and the overwhelming satisfaction folks are having is worth taking into consideration as well.

W</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stew you are welcome. </p>
<p>I really think that this is a good time to call Ironmaster. If Matt is not able to address your concerns adequately then I really think the Powerblocks should be your choice. However, talk to Matt. Perhaps Ironmaster has addressed the issues of the screws.</p>
<p>Also, if you think that the lack of close tolerances reflects poorly in a company, then this is personal red flag you should respect. Don&#8217;t ignore your own instincts. Go with what brings you the most peace. Don&#8217;t buy something of this nature if you are not 100% sure of it. You live in Canada, and you can ill afford to get something you end up not liking.</p>
<p>That said, I think these comments and the overwhelming satisfaction folks are having is worth taking into consideration as well.</p>
<p>W</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stewie griffin</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6519</link>
		<dc:creator>stewie griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6519</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the quick response!

Precision is part of quality assurance and is a reflection of the company, and of course for a higher price. But as mentioned, this is not a &quot;deal breaker&quot; for me just a concern.

But the thought of the locks not screwing in properly along with false positives in lock would definitely be a deal breaker, I would definitely pay more for the security of the plate not falling on my head/chest or feet.

I&#039;m in Canada, and shipping product back to IronMaster (under warranty) is a cost they do not take, Canadian dealers are taken out of the equation and it is a cost to me and can be quite prohibitive. They only cover the cost to send the repaired product to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the quick response!</p>
<p>Precision is part of quality assurance and is a reflection of the company, and of course for a higher price. But as mentioned, this is not a &#8220;deal breaker&#8221; for me just a concern.</p>
<p>But the thought of the locks not screwing in properly along with false positives in lock would definitely be a deal breaker, I would definitely pay more for the security of the plate not falling on my head/chest or feet.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m in Canada, and shipping product back to IronMaster (under warranty) is a cost they do not take, Canadian dealers are taken out of the equation and it is a cost to me and can be quite prohibitive. They only cover the cost to send the repaired product to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6517</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6517</guid>
		<description>Stew, thanks for the post.

I have two responses. 

With respect to the weight variance, I doubt Ironmind has done anything about it. My guess is that to machine the plates to exacting standards costs a bit more, an in order to keep the set affordable, a less expensive tolerance is allowed. 

Let me ask you a question. The Powerblocks have a closer tolerance in terms of weight. Have you looked at these? I am not trying to push you away, but if precise poundage is what you are looking for, Powerblocks offer it. Mind you, the PB 130&#039;s cost $898.00, and that does not include the stand. 

My guess is that you desire the Ironmasters for a reason, or you would not be wishing to make a purchase. Maybe you like the rugged feel of the knurling, and the fact that Ironmasters can be dropped without voiding a warranty. Maybe you like the fact that the feel more like traditional dumbbells. All very good reasons. But, if Ironmaster told you that they could get the tolerances to the standards you want, and custom build you a set in order to do it, but that it would cost you over $1000.00, then would you give Ironmaster the green light? 

Personally, I suspected that the weight might be off by around 5% or so, but it didn&#039;t matter to me because the 120 lbs felt heavy as crap to me, never mind the fact that they might have been 5 pounds off. Still, if it really matters that much to you, and for some people it will, just opt for the Powerblocks.

Regarding the screws, I have no idea. I never had an issue, but clearly one or two folks here have. Call Ironmaster and talk to them about your concerns. Ask for Matt. If he is available, he will take your call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stew, thanks for the post.</p>
<p>I have two responses. </p>
<p>With respect to the weight variance, I doubt Ironmind has done anything about it. My guess is that to machine the plates to exacting standards costs a bit more, an in order to keep the set affordable, a less expensive tolerance is allowed. </p>
<p>Let me ask you a question. The Powerblocks have a closer tolerance in terms of weight. Have you looked at these? I am not trying to push you away, but if precise poundage is what you are looking for, Powerblocks offer it. Mind you, the PB 130&#8242;s cost $898.00, and that does not include the stand. </p>
<p>My guess is that you desire the Ironmasters for a reason, or you would not be wishing to make a purchase. Maybe you like the rugged feel of the knurling, and the fact that Ironmasters can be dropped without voiding a warranty. Maybe you like the fact that the feel more like traditional dumbbells. All very good reasons. But, if Ironmaster told you that they could get the tolerances to the standards you want, and custom build you a set in order to do it, but that it would cost you over $1000.00, then would you give Ironmaster the green light? </p>
<p>Personally, I suspected that the weight might be off by around 5% or so, but it didn&#8217;t matter to me because the 120 lbs felt heavy as crap to me, never mind the fact that they might have been 5 pounds off. Still, if it really matters that much to you, and for some people it will, just opt for the Powerblocks.</p>
<p>Regarding the screws, I have no idea. I never had an issue, but clearly one or two folks here have. Call Ironmaster and talk to them about your concerns. Ask for Matt. If he is available, he will take your call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stewie griffin</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6516</link>
		<dc:creator>stewie griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 19:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6516</guid>
		<description>Hey All,

This is a great sight for the QL dumbbells. I&#039;m looking to potentially purchase a pair of the QL dumbbells within the next 2 weeks, with a few quality control issues (two of them being deal breakers) that concern me:

1) the screw lock issue that Espy and others had issues with, along with a false positive on tightening (deal breakers) and

2) to a lesser extent, the possible ~10% variance in weight plates...

Has Ironmaster done anything to address these issues?

I&#039;m from Toronto, Ontario. Canada. and shopping for the best deal out there (combined QL price and shipping). I have only been able to find 3 dealers in Canada that are relatively close to me:
 
1) Exercise Direct (Winnipeg/Thunder Bay), 2) Fitness Equipment Ottawa and 3) Club Pascine (Quebec).

Club Pascine has the lowest price, but I have to arrange for shipping. Fitness Ottawa is the most expensive, but they have shipping in place. I will contact Exercise Direct tomorrow, but I suspect shipping will be too much..

Anyone else know of other locations in Ontario that are closer to Toronto than Ottawa? and might offer a better deal? tks, sg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey All,</p>
<p>This is a great sight for the QL dumbbells. I&#8217;m looking to potentially purchase a pair of the QL dumbbells within the next 2 weeks, with a few quality control issues (two of them being deal breakers) that concern me:</p>
<p>1) the screw lock issue that Espy and others had issues with, along with a false positive on tightening (deal breakers) and</p>
<p>2) to a lesser extent, the possible ~10% variance in weight plates&#8230;</p>
<p>Has Ironmaster done anything to address these issues?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m from Toronto, Ontario. Canada. and shopping for the best deal out there (combined QL price and shipping). I have only been able to find 3 dealers in Canada that are relatively close to me:</p>
<p>1) Exercise Direct (Winnipeg/Thunder Bay), 2) Fitness Equipment Ottawa and 3) Club Pascine (Quebec).</p>
<p>Club Pascine has the lowest price, but I have to arrange for shipping. Fitness Ottawa is the most expensive, but they have shipping in place. I will contact Exercise Direct tomorrow, but I suspect shipping will be too much..</p>
<p>Anyone else know of other locations in Ontario that are closer to Toronto than Ottawa? and might offer a better deal? tks, sg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6504</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6504</guid>
		<description>Well, definitely keep us posted. Good luck with your purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, definitely keep us posted. Good luck with your purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6503</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6503</guid>
		<description>I just talked on the phone with Tim at Ironmaster.  He said that there is someone that works out with him (Mike, I believe was the name) who is 6&#039; 4&quot; tall and only has issues with the leg attachment (which the web site already points out).  Beyond that, he hasn&#039;t seen any problems.  So I think I will go ahead and start with the Super Bench, knowing that I can take advantage of the 30-day guarantee if I have any problems.

Thanks again for all the great information here.  I hope to place my order in the next couple of weeks.  Once I&#039;ve been able to work with the bench (and dumbbells) for a bit I&#039;ll be sure to add another comment with a tall guy&#039;s perspective (although the guy who lives across the street from me is 6&#039; 7&quot; and keeps reminding me I&#039;m not *that* tall).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just talked on the phone with Tim at Ironmaster.  He said that there is someone that works out with him (Mike, I believe was the name) who is 6&#8242; 4&#8243; tall and only has issues with the leg attachment (which the web site already points out).  Beyond that, he hasn&#8217;t seen any problems.  So I think I will go ahead and start with the Super Bench, knowing that I can take advantage of the 30-day guarantee if I have any problems.</p>
<p>Thanks again for all the great information here.  I hope to place my order in the next couple of weeks.  Once I&#8217;ve been able to work with the bench (and dumbbells) for a bit I&#8217;ll be sure to add another comment with a tall guy&#8217;s perspective (although the guy who lives across the street from me is 6&#8242; 7&#8243; and keeps reminding me I&#8217;m not *that* tall).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6501</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6501</guid>
		<description>David, you are welcome, and thanks again for adding yet another great reply to what is a very helpful thread for lots of folks.

I understand your desire to maximize your bang for the buck with the attachments to the Super Bench. Sure, why not try it out for 30 days. I know Matt&#039;s training partner is 6&#039;3&quot; tall, and he seems to like it, but tack on another two inches and maybe you are in different territory. Only you can know what it is like to be 6&#039;5&quot; tall in a world built for shorter folks. In answer to your other question, I use to train at the UVa weight room many years before they built the McCue Center (UVA&#039;s famed football sports facility). I seem to recall a wooden stair-stepped contraption that they had built and it was quite sturdy and stable. It was built so that you could place one end of a flat utility bench on the first two or three stair steps. Imagine a more streamlined version of something like this (minus the handrails of course, most of which I was able to erase): 

&lt;p class=&quot;feature2&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://totalphysiqueonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/stairs.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Stairs&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

As I recall, it offered some basic angles, nothing precise, but enough to get the desired affect. 

Actually, I have always felt that most incline benches in gyms were too steep and placed too much stress on the shoulders. I found the stairs approach to offer the ideal angle.

Obviously, this is one of those areas where I need to urge care and caution. Discovering homemade contraptions in gyms is nothing new. Often times weightlifters improvise to come up with ways in which to challenge themselves and stimulate new gains in size and strength. Often times, this leads to tremendous success. On the other hand, it can sometimes lead to disaster if the homemade gadgets are not built well, or if the overall concept is a disaster in the making from its very conception. The steps in our gym were ideal for our needs and enabled us to get more out of our flat utility benches, which came in handy on crowded days when the traditional inclines were being used or when we just needed that certain &quot;feel&quot; we could not get from the incline presses (which was often). All I am saying is proceed with caution, consider your options and make the choice that seems best for your needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, you are welcome, and thanks again for adding yet another great reply to what is a very helpful thread for lots of folks.</p>
<p>I understand your desire to maximize your bang for the buck with the attachments to the Super Bench. Sure, why not try it out for 30 days. I know Matt&#8217;s training partner is 6&#8217;3&#8243; tall, and he seems to like it, but tack on another two inches and maybe you are in different territory. Only you can know what it is like to be 6&#8217;5&#8243; tall in a world built for shorter folks. In answer to your other question, I use to train at the UVa weight room many years before they built the McCue Center (UVA&#8217;s famed football sports facility). I seem to recall a wooden stair-stepped contraption that they had built and it was quite sturdy and stable. It was built so that you could place one end of a flat utility bench on the first two or three stair steps. Imagine a more streamlined version of something like this (minus the handrails of course, most of which I was able to erase): </p>
<p class="feature2"><img src="http://totalphysiqueonline.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/stairs.jpg" alt="Stairs" /></p>
<p>As I recall, it offered some basic angles, nothing precise, but enough to get the desired affect. </p>
<p>Actually, I have always felt that most incline benches in gyms were too steep and placed too much stress on the shoulders. I found the stairs approach to offer the ideal angle.</p>
<p>Obviously, this is one of those areas where I need to urge care and caution. Discovering homemade contraptions in gyms is nothing new. Often times weightlifters improvise to come up with ways in which to challenge themselves and stimulate new gains in size and strength. Often times, this leads to tremendous success. On the other hand, it can sometimes lead to disaster if the homemade gadgets are not built well, or if the overall concept is a disaster in the making from its very conception. The steps in our gym were ideal for our needs and enabled us to get more out of our flat utility benches, which came in handy on crowded days when the traditional inclines were being used or when we just needed that certain &#8220;feel&#8221; we could not get from the incline presses (which was often). All I am saying is proceed with caution, consider your options and make the choice that seems best for your needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6500</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 23:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6500</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info.  Now it seems my perfect starter home gym (the QL dumbbells and the Super Bench) may not be as perfect as I thought.  I was leaning toward an adjustable bench, because I wanted to do incline presses with it.  I see in the comments for your review of the 5-Star Bench that there are ways to do incline presses using a flat bench (and Kevin actually prefers doing it that way).  Do you know where I can get more information on that along with photos if possible?  

I do agree that a bench that fits is better than a more versatile bench that doesn&#039;t.  I was looking forward to expanding the Super Bench with the cable tower attachment, though.  I also don&#039;t like the fact that purchasing the QL&#039;s and the 5-Star (with shipping) will put me $143 over my $800 budget.  Maybe it&#039;s time for Ironmaster to design the Super Duper Bench.  I will give Ironmaster a call when I get some time and get some more information from the source.  It might be worthwhile to get the Super Bench anyway and take advantage of the 30-day guarantee if it really doesn&#039;t work for me.

Thanks again for the great information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info.  Now it seems my perfect starter home gym (the QL dumbbells and the Super Bench) may not be as perfect as I thought.  I was leaning toward an adjustable bench, because I wanted to do incline presses with it.  I see in the comments for your review of the 5-Star Bench that there are ways to do incline presses using a flat bench (and Kevin actually prefers doing it that way).  Do you know where I can get more information on that along with photos if possible?  </p>
<p>I do agree that a bench that fits is better than a more versatile bench that doesn&#8217;t.  I was looking forward to expanding the Super Bench with the cable tower attachment, though.  I also don&#8217;t like the fact that purchasing the QL&#8217;s and the 5-Star (with shipping) will put me $143 over my $800 budget.  Maybe it&#8217;s time for Ironmaster to design the Super Duper Bench.  I will give Ironmaster a call when I get some time and get some more information from the source.  It might be worthwhile to get the Super Bench anyway and take advantage of the 30-day guarantee if it really doesn&#8217;t work for me.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the great information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6496</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6496</guid>
		<description>David, welcome aboard!

I understand your dilemma. Well sort of. I am 5&#039;6&quot; tall, and the Super Bench is awesome for someone my height. And as much as I would like to recommend the Super Bench, I cannot in good conscience do it only because the Super Bench is 44 inches long and 10 inches wide. Of course, this is amply designed for most folks, but you are a big unit to say the least.

I must, therefore, suggest you look at the Ironmind 5-Star Flat Bench. This is a bench I have in my own personal collection. It is not adjustable, and not expandable, but it is 48 inches long a full 12 inches wide! Those are some dimensions I think you can live with.

Have a look at my review: http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2008/07/10/ironmind-five-star-flat-bench-review/

I think that between the Quick Lock Dumbbells and the 5-Star Bench, you would be well on your way to a super home gym. Of course, if you are a purest and wish to order from one company, I would suggest you Ironmaster and speak to Matt and get his two cents.

I took the liberty of calling Matt myself, and he also agreed that at your size, the 5-Star  might be a better choice of the two benches. But, in the interest of research, call him if you like and talk to him some. He is a very approachable guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, welcome aboard!</p>
<p>I understand your dilemma. Well sort of. I am 5&#8217;6&#8243; tall, and the Super Bench is awesome for someone my height. And as much as I would like to recommend the Super Bench, I cannot in good conscience do it only because the Super Bench is 44 inches long and 10 inches wide. Of course, this is amply designed for most folks, but you are a big unit to say the least.</p>
<p>I must, therefore, suggest you look at the Ironmind 5-Star Flat Bench. This is a bench I have in my own personal collection. It is not adjustable, and not expandable, but it is 48 inches long a full 12 inches wide! Those are some dimensions I think you can live with.</p>
<p>Have a look at my review: <a href="http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2008/07/10/ironmind-five-star-flat-bench-review/" rel="nofollow">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2008/07/10/ironmind-five-star-flat-bench-review/</a></p>
<p>I think that between the Quick Lock Dumbbells and the 5-Star Bench, you would be well on your way to a super home gym. Of course, if you are a purest and wish to order from one company, I would suggest you Ironmaster and speak to Matt and get his two cents.</p>
<p>I took the liberty of calling Matt myself, and he also agreed that at your size, the 5-Star  might be a better choice of the two benches. But, in the interest of research, call him if you like and talk to him some. He is a very approachable guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6495</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6495</guid>
		<description>First, the praise:  I, too, am in the market for a adjustable dumbbell system to start a home workout program.  (My company is now offering a new fitness program with $800 towards home exercise equipment--if they&#039;re giving me money, I&#039;m more than happy to spend it.)  After a little research, I narrowed it down to the Powerblocks and the Ironmaster.  Then I found this page.  After reading this great review and all of the great comments (almost 2 years&#039; worth), the decision is easy.  The hard part is waiting for the green light on the fitness benefit, then I&#039;ll place my order (package 1).  If I keep it up all year, then I&#039;ll use next year&#039;s $800 to get the accessories (starting with the cable tower attachment and the crunch attachment).

Now, my questions.  Most of my questions have been asked and answered in the comments, but I do have this one:  I&#039;m 6&#039; 5&quot; tall (I wish I had the physique to go with it) and I&#039;m wondering how well the bench works for tall people in the different configurations.  The Ironmaster site does point out that the leg attachment might have problems for taller people, but that&#039;s about it.  Can anyone else give any additional insight?

I&#039;m also interested if anyone has the cable tower attachment.  Once it&#039;s attached to the super bench can I still do all the exercises I was doing with the bench alone, or would I have to detach it from the tower first?  If so, how easy is it to detach/re-attach the tower?

Thanks again for a great review and now a whole Ironmaster community,
David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, the praise:  I, too, am in the market for a adjustable dumbbell system to start a home workout program.  (My company is now offering a new fitness program with $800 towards home exercise equipment&#8211;if they&#8217;re giving me money, I&#8217;m more than happy to spend it.)  After a little research, I narrowed it down to the Powerblocks and the Ironmaster.  Then I found this page.  After reading this great review and all of the great comments (almost 2 years&#8217; worth), the decision is easy.  The hard part is waiting for the green light on the fitness benefit, then I&#8217;ll place my order (package 1).  If I keep it up all year, then I&#8217;ll use next year&#8217;s $800 to get the accessories (starting with the cable tower attachment and the crunch attachment).</p>
<p>Now, my questions.  Most of my questions have been asked and answered in the comments, but I do have this one:  I&#8217;m 6&#8242; 5&#8243; tall (I wish I had the physique to go with it) and I&#8217;m wondering how well the bench works for tall people in the different configurations.  The Ironmaster site does point out that the leg attachment might have problems for taller people, but that&#8217;s about it.  Can anyone else give any additional insight?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also interested if anyone has the cable tower attachment.  Once it&#8217;s attached to the super bench can I still do all the exercises I was doing with the bench alone, or would I have to detach it from the tower first?  If so, how easy is it to detach/re-attach the tower?</p>
<p>Thanks again for a great review and now a whole Ironmaster community,<br />
David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mongcong</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6446</link>
		<dc:creator>mongcong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6446</guid>
		<description>Got my Quicklocks a few weeks ago from a retailer in Ontario.  I am very pleased.  No need to rephrase all the praise in the above 133 postings.  Solid and dependable.  I&#039;m getting faster with the changes and don&#039;t see any issues with the length of time to change weights.  I spent a small fortune on the Quicklocks and I feel it was well worth it.  Can&#039;t wait until the 120 lb add on is &quot;required&quot;!  Good luck in your purchase to all who stumble upon this thread.
Mongcong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got my Quicklocks a few weeks ago from a retailer in Ontario.  I am very pleased.  No need to rephrase all the praise in the above 133 postings.  Solid and dependable.  I&#8217;m getting faster with the changes and don&#8217;t see any issues with the length of time to change weights.  I spent a small fortune on the Quicklocks and I feel it was well worth it.  Can&#8217;t wait until the 120 lb add on is &#8220;required&#8221;!  Good luck in your purchase to all who stumble upon this thread.<br />
Mongcong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6443</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6443</guid>
		<description>Lee, I know you will be happy. Everyone who gets these dumbbells raves. Don&#039;t train too much too fast, and please keep us posted. Let know your progress. Congrats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee, I know you will be happy. Everyone who gets these dumbbells raves. Don&#8217;t train too much too fast, and please keep us posted. Let know your progress. Congrats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6442</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 02:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6442</guid>
		<description>I recently recieved my ironmaster dumbells and could not be happier. I like the feel and the quality seems excellent. Initially I was going to purchase power blocks, although now I&#039;m glad I didn&#039;t. If these dumbells are as well made as they seem, then I look forward to many years of enjoyment! Both Bowflex and the Weider version were bulky (too long) and felt cheaply made. The powerblocks had very little space for my hands and had an awkward feel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently recieved my ironmaster dumbells and could not be happier. I like the feel and the quality seems excellent. Initially I was going to purchase power blocks, although now I&#8217;m glad I didn&#8217;t. If these dumbells are as well made as they seem, then I look forward to many years of enjoyment! Both Bowflex and the Weider version were bulky (too long) and felt cheaply made. The powerblocks had very little space for my hands and had an awkward feel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: webmaster</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6441</link>
		<dc:creator>webmaster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6441</guid>
		<description>Dalton, if they handed out Pulitzer&#039;s for comments, your comment would be taking top prize. This is very well written, informative and enjoyable to read. 

I suspect that after the Holidays lots of people will be making new commitments with respect to their health and fitness needs. This happens every year and has since probably the beginning of time. Every year the sporting goods stores are packed tight with folks buying the newest fitness gadgets and gimmicks. And every year, around the same time, the same group of people are right back at the same stores buying a new gadget or gimmick that is sure to change their level of fitness conditioning once and for all.  And so the cycle goes. What makes this so axiomatic?

I am convinced that that one of the biggest reasons people like those mentioned above find themselves stuck in this endless loop of fitness madness is because the things they buy are just so much junk. Garages, attics and junk yards the world over are spilling over with discarded or broken fitness gizmo&#039;s of all sizes and shapes. Invariably these onetime shiny, plush toys, failed to live up to the promise of durability or they were so poorly designed in the first place that they simply failed to function as a true fitness tool. In short, they were never designed for function, they were only designed for form - to look nice, but not to build strength. Of course, nothing can compensate for lack of motivation. I don&#039;t care how well a piece of equipment is designed, if someone is too lazy to get off their wrinkly old flabby ass and actually use the equipment then one can hardly blame the tool, now can one? Still, a well made and functional strength tool that efficiently builds slabs of strong, sinewy muscle is it&#039;s own motivator. Plus, you HAVE to be able to trust the equipment you buy. If the tools you buy are tough as nails, then you won&#039;t be afraid to trust your life to it.

As everyone who follows the advice of this thread has found out, Ironmaster makes tough, effective and functional strength training tools that just so happen to be nice to look at as well. If you are planning to invest a large chunk of change in a home gym, don&#039;t spend your time and hard earned money at the local sporting goods store. All you will end up doing is wasting plenty of both.

This sort of investment is something you only want to do once in a lifetime, and so it stands to reason that you should buy from a professional strength company that makes tools designed to last a lifetime and give you a lifetime of results you can be excited about. A relative handful of companies fall into that category. Ironmaster if one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dalton, if they handed out Pulitzer&#8217;s for comments, your comment would be taking top prize. This is very well written, informative and enjoyable to read. </p>
<p>I suspect that after the Holidays lots of people will be making new commitments with respect to their health and fitness needs. This happens every year and has since probably the beginning of time. Every year the sporting goods stores are packed tight with folks buying the newest fitness gadgets and gimmicks. And every year, around the same time, the same group of people are right back at the same stores buying a new gadget or gimmick that is sure to change their level of fitness conditioning once and for all.  And so the cycle goes. What makes this so axiomatic?</p>
<p>I am convinced that that one of the biggest reasons people like those mentioned above find themselves stuck in this endless loop of fitness madness is because the things they buy are just so much junk. Garages, attics and junk yards the world over are spilling over with discarded or broken fitness gizmo&#8217;s of all sizes and shapes. Invariably these onetime shiny, plush toys, failed to live up to the promise of durability or they were so poorly designed in the first place that they simply failed to function as a true fitness tool. In short, they were never designed for function, they were only designed for form &#8211; to look nice, but not to build strength. Of course, nothing can compensate for lack of motivation. I don&#8217;t care how well a piece of equipment is designed, if someone is too lazy to get off their wrinkly old flabby ass and actually use the equipment then one can hardly blame the tool, now can one? Still, a well made and functional strength tool that efficiently builds slabs of strong, sinewy muscle is it&#8217;s own motivator. Plus, you HAVE to be able to trust the equipment you buy. If the tools you buy are tough as nails, then you won&#8217;t be afraid to trust your life to it.</p>
<p>As everyone who follows the advice of this thread has found out, Ironmaster makes tough, effective and functional strength training tools that just so happen to be nice to look at as well. If you are planning to invest a large chunk of change in a home gym, don&#8217;t spend your time and hard earned money at the local sporting goods store. All you will end up doing is wasting plenty of both.</p>
<p>This sort of investment is something you only want to do once in a lifetime, and so it stands to reason that you should buy from a professional strength company that makes tools designed to last a lifetime and give you a lifetime of results you can be excited about. A relative handful of companies fall into that category. Ironmaster if one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6440</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 06:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6440</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone,

I finally made a decision, decided to take the plunge and purchased Ironmaster dumbbells, bench, and crunch attachment recently.  I have received all items, assembled all required elements, and I must say that I am more than happy with my purchase.  I researched adjustable dumbbell options for about a month, looked at around 5-6 different adjustable dumbbell models, and it ultimately was a contest between Ironmaster and Powerblock.  But, in the end, after now having the opportunity to try both of them, I can truly say that there really is no comparison between the two.  Just as I suspected.  The one supposed trump card Powerblock users always tout in comparison to Ironmaster is the rapidity of weight change.  Red herring.  In my opinion, it&#039;s almost just as easy to change weights on the Ironmasters.  I take both quick-lock locking screws off at the same time, quickly adjust weights, and put quick-locks back on the handles simutaneously.  Simple as that.  So easy.  Plus, unlike Powerblocks, you don&#039;t have to worry about incorrectly installing a selector pin and weights falling on your head or feet.  I almost bought Powerblocks because I was caught up on the idea of quick weight change, but now I am so glad I went with Ironmaster because the weight change variant between PB and IM is so negligible as to really be a total non-issue.  Everything else considered, IM is simply a better dumbbell.
I am very grateful to all parties who helped form my decision to go with Ironmaster.  I referenced Amazon reviews, bodybuilding forums, and several Ironmaster owners in the formation of my opinion concerning this product.  I&#039;d like to particularly thank the webmaster of this blog, Timothy, for patiently answering all of my questions and guiding me through all relevant information on my journey.  He&#039;s been a great help and a superb guide.  And thanks to all who have written personal stories on this blog.  I&#039;ve read every single one of them, and each one helped to solidify my choice.
If, like myself, the reader of this post happened upon this blog in an attempt to decide what adjustable dumbbell to buy, my advice is this:  do your research.  All adjustable dumbbells are expensive, and if you are going to put down a lot of money for dumbbells, you might as well get the most for your money.

Many thanks,
Dalton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone,</p>
<p>I finally made a decision, decided to take the plunge and purchased Ironmaster dumbbells, bench, and crunch attachment recently.  I have received all items, assembled all required elements, and I must say that I am more than happy with my purchase.  I researched adjustable dumbbell options for about a month, looked at around 5-6 different adjustable dumbbell models, and it ultimately was a contest between Ironmaster and Powerblock.  But, in the end, after now having the opportunity to try both of them, I can truly say that there really is no comparison between the two.  Just as I suspected.  The one supposed trump card Powerblock users always tout in comparison to Ironmaster is the rapidity of weight change.  Red herring.  In my opinion, it&#8217;s almost just as easy to change weights on the Ironmasters.  I take both quick-lock locking screws off at the same time, quickly adjust weights, and put quick-locks back on the handles simutaneously.  Simple as that.  So easy.  Plus, unlike Powerblocks, you don&#8217;t have to worry about incorrectly installing a selector pin and weights falling on your head or feet.  I almost bought Powerblocks because I was caught up on the idea of quick weight change, but now I am so glad I went with Ironmaster because the weight change variant between PB and IM is so negligible as to really be a total non-issue.  Everything else considered, IM is simply a better dumbbell.<br />
I am very grateful to all parties who helped form my decision to go with Ironmaster.  I referenced Amazon reviews, bodybuilding forums, and several Ironmaster owners in the formation of my opinion concerning this product.  I&#8217;d like to particularly thank the webmaster of this blog, Timothy, for patiently answering all of my questions and guiding me through all relevant information on my journey.  He&#8217;s been a great help and a superb guide.  And thanks to all who have written personal stories on this blog.  I&#8217;ve read every single one of them, and each one helped to solidify my choice.<br />
If, like myself, the reader of this post happened upon this blog in an attempt to decide what adjustable dumbbell to buy, my advice is this:  do your research.  All adjustable dumbbells are expensive, and if you are going to put down a lot of money for dumbbells, you might as well get the most for your money.</p>
<p>Many thanks,<br />
Dalton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6433</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6433</guid>
		<description>I have had the 75 lbs dumbbells for a while and absolutely love them. I remember thinking I&#039;d never need any more than 75 lbs, but now I am Incline Benching with the full 75 lbs, so looks like I have to spring for the 120 lbs upgrades! It&#039;s a good problem to have though :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had the 75 lbs dumbbells for a while and absolutely love them. I remember thinking I&#8217;d never need any more than 75 lbs, but now I am Incline Benching with the full 75 lbs, so looks like I have to spring for the 120 lbs upgrades! It&#8217;s a good problem to have though <img src='http://totalphysiqueonline.com/wordpress/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mongcong</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6432</link>
		<dc:creator>mongcong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 00:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6432</guid>
		<description>Brandon - If you&#039;re seriously considering purchasing the Quicklocks, email me (posting #115).  You&#039;d be the third person in London looking to get these.  I&#039;m going to see if we can get a good discount for multiple purchases.  I&#039;ll be looking to buy within the week (I&#039;m just waiting for my Ebay auctions to end - under the same name if you&#039;re curious).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon &#8211; If you&#8217;re seriously considering purchasing the Quicklocks, email me (posting #115).  You&#8217;d be the third person in London looking to get these.  I&#8217;m going to see if we can get a good discount for multiple purchases.  I&#8217;ll be looking to buy within the week (I&#8217;m just waiting for my Ebay auctions to end &#8211; under the same name if you&#8217;re curious).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dalton</title>
		<link>http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6431</link>
		<dc:creator>Dalton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://totalphysiqueonline.com/2007/01/30/ironmaster-quick-lock-dumbbell-system-review-part1/#comment-6431</guid>
		<description>Tim,

Contact me via email, please.  I have a question for you.
Thanks.

Dalton</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,</p>
<p>Contact me via email, please.  I have a question for you.<br />
Thanks.</p>
<p>Dalton</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

